Only to people who think you need to impose your values on others and the ends justify the ( illegal and immoral ) means.

I suppose you supported the crusades too.

Then what is 'my country' and 'my business', if you are so smart? ( and whatever your answer is, its wrong. )

Also, if you were to understand how china works, you dont have to create the tool, all you have to do is tell others its there to earn your [well deserved] fate. The fewer nosy people left in the world like you, the better the world would be.

Forgot to add, i bet you are for no borders for sovereign nations either. Just make it one happy world with rainbows and unicorns.

You would be pissed if china's citizens interfered with your rights and laws.

Hypocritical pin-headed idiot.

It is not that simple, both legally or morally, ( of course to a simpleton as yourself you may not fully grasp what you are suggesting ). Its too bad you cant be extradited to china, then executed, for your interfering transgressions.

Its not your country, keep your nose out of it.

You just said that its OK to interfere with other countries simply because you felt its right, which proves my point. Even a child could figure out that one.

I do hope some other country comes and interferes with you, because they "feel its right". Would serve you right.

Oh, and i never said 'take over', might want to learn some reading comprehension.

Even better, buy it on the way to the protest. Using cash of course.

I didnt bother reading the EFF advice but if you take your own stuff to a demonstration, you are a fool. You never know what may happen, you go with a minimal amount of items with you. ID ( required to avoid many vagrant arrest laws ), a few bucks in cash for a burger if you are stuck waiting on a ride from jail ( or the hospital ).. Hide your car keys ON your car.. No jewelry or a watch. A few contact numbers in your pocket, in case you are unconscious when found.

Thanks for proving my point.

Technically, yes.

However, citizens in the us do have the right of free speech, and some would say that 'copyright restrictions' violate that right in the first place, so its not really a fair comparison.

Simple answer : NO.

Longer answer: Not everyone wants to burn mobile data time just to listen to local radio stations while they are out and about. Besides mobile data issues, soon home bandwidth caps will shrink down to ludicrous levels, unless you are consuming the ( extra charge ) content from your provider.

But also on the consumers of electricity.. Just as the feds want. Bleed us dry.

It all trickles down to the 'guy on the street in the end, and we are the ones that pay..

There are ads (buy now) everywhere in the modern world (buy now).

From billboards, to clothes, the drink you are holding, to the car that just passed you on the road, its invaded every part of our lives. Everyone is competing for your attention 24/7. Its not going away.

I am pro sovereignty. China has a right to restrict any speech they like [with their own citizens], and you have no right to interfere.

You, and meddling do-gooders like you, are 'my problem'.

I have a problem with people like you meddling in the affairs of other countries. Keep your nose out of their business.

Who gives you the right to impress your concepts of right and wrong onto the citizens of another sovereign nation and its people?

How would you feel if another country did it to you?

Yet another reason to find a way around the speed of light.

Actually I've always said (jokingly) that if anyone does find a way to go FTL, it'll be the computer chip manufacturers. In fact Brad Torgersen and I had a story to that effect in Analog magazine a couple of years ago, "Strobe Effect".