Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Can we just get the consumption tax, already... (Score 1) 1505

I am a Democrat, and while I think the Mike Huckabee is a complete idiot on the great majority of his stances, I think his income tax abolishment and consumption tax proposal has great merit.

All we need to do is increase the state sales tax rate by the amount of the consumption tax. Then, the state can make tax payments to the federal government. No more income tax. Take a tax whenever money is exchanged for goods or services.

This means that we get all of the tax revenue when illegally acquired revenue gets spent. We also get federal tax revenue from visiting tourists. We also (finally) get the federal tax revenue from churches when they spend money. It also means that people who save (and not spend) actually get an immediate benefit by investing/saving.

Taxing income is moronic. There's too many ways to dodge it, too many ways to loophole it, too many ways to deduct it, too many ways to make exceptions.

Make it fair for everyone. Charge federal tax at the cash register.

Comment Re:Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is (Score 1) 705

This theory breaks when the person who uses the bomb doesn't care about their own destruction. Once you stop caring about retaliation, all bets are off.

It isn't when the person doesn't care. It is when the entire chain of individuals responsible for launching the nuke doesn't care.

This is why MAD works. If MAD was in the hands of any one individual, it wouldn't work.

Even if a crackpot leader wanted to launch a nuke or some other WMD, they couldn't do so if their subordinates couldn't be convinced to follow the order. I'm fairly certain that crackpot leaders have wanted to push the button in the past -- and were rebuked. You are naive if you think this situation hasn't occurred before.

I'm not worried one bit about North Korean or Iranian leaders and their grandstanding.

What does worry me is that world leaders don't do enough to understand and address the motivation behind this grandstanding.

Comment Uh... this is genius? (Score -1, Flamebait) 109

Wow, what amazing genius.

What we have is an MIT CS dork who is bringing everything full circle and realizing that actually rotation, movement, and proximity are important factors in a human-to-machine interface.

NO SHIT SHERLOCK.

Is this really that ground-breaking? My god. Ever see a music mixing board? Ever see a keyboard synthesizer? Ever see a hifi music component? Ever see a car? Ever see a door? All of these machines have knobs, sliders, buttons, handles, and a brain which can alter the behavior of the machine based on the combinations of positions of knobs and sliders and buttons.

So this guy is asserting that these concepts are going to introduce a new and innovative way that humans interact with machines? GIVE ME A BREAK.

Perhaps next, he should create a new tool called a "roundling" which looks exactly like a tire and will revolutionize the way that humans move from one place to another.

Comment Such a tool... (Score 4, Insightful) 538

I have to say after reading this article -- Stroustrup is a tool. It is just that simple. Nothing more than a pundit at this point. He had a stroke of genius in programming and now is an expert in everything related to programming.

He thinks companies aren't happy with their graduates? Well, I say companies have terrible hiring practices, terrible mentorship programs, and ridiculous expectations.

Balance the theoretical and the practical? Wow. Brilliant observation. Great, Bjarne. Please give us more sweeping Karate-Kid style one-liners.

High schools should teach students to work hard? Great, Bjarne. Thanks again for that. Search out information as needed? Another stroke of brilliance. Express ideas in writing and verbally? WOW. PINCH ME. Such genius can only be dreamed of.

Then, the article closes with him trying to be edgy and go out "with a bang". Sloppy, fat geeks. Nice. This guy is a douchebag. Pure and simple.

Here is my own contribution to douchbaggery... I think we should take aging, isolated, self-important pundits out into a remote area and bury them neck deep in the dirt.

Caldera

SCO Loses 643

An anonymous reader writes "The one summary judgement that puts a stick into SCO's spokes has just come down. The judge in the epic SCO case has ruled that SCO doesn't own the Unix copyrights. With that one decision, a whole bunch of other decisions will fall like dominoes. As PJ says, 'That's Aaaaall, Folks! ... All right, all you Doubting Thomases. I double dog dare you to complain about the US court system now. I told you if you would just be patient, I had confidence in the system's ability to sort this out in the end. But we must say thank you to Novell and especially to its legal team for the incredible work they have done. I know it's not technically over and there will be more to slog through, but they won what matters most, and it's been a plum pleasin' pleasure watching you work. The entire FOSS community thanks you for your skill and all the hard work and thanks go to Novell for being willing to see this through."
The Courts

US Attorney General Questions Habeas Corpus 1151

spiedrazer writes "In yet another attempt to create legitimacy for the Bush Administration's many questionable legal practices, US attorney General Alberto Gonzales actually had the audacity to argue before a Congressional committee that the US Constitution doesn't explicitly bestow habeas corpus rights on US citizens. In his view it merely says when the so-called Great Writ can be suspended, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the rights are granted. The Attorney General was being questioned by Sen. Arlen Specter at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Jan. 18. THe MSM are not covering this story but Colbert is (click on the fourth video down, 'Exact Words')." From the Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel commentary: "While Gonzales's statement has a measure of quibbling precision to it, his logic is troubling because it would suggest that many other fundamental rights that Americans hold dear (such as free speech, freedom of religion, and the right to assemble peacefully) also don't exist because the Constitution often spells out those rights in the negative. It boggles the mind the lengths this administration will go to to systematically erode the rights and privileges we have all counted on and held up as the granite pillars of our society since our nation was founded."

Slashdot Top Deals

One small step for man, one giant stumble for mankind.

Working...