Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:It's OK to attack mythology and superstition... (Score 1) 266

You have to distinguish between what people more-or-less believe and how much they believe it. Most people in the US were raised more or less Christian, and tend to see religious things in Christian terms. If they turn atheist, they specifically don't believe in Christianity. If they start wanting religion, it's Christianity. I find myself doing that sometimes, and I've been, both theoretically and practically, a non-Christian for decades. Therefore, if they "get religion", it's usually not Buddhism or Shinto. (When I was young, there was a trend to adopt Eastern religions, typically Buddhism. It would be interesting to know how many people who were raised Christian and turned some form of Buddhist are of which religion nowadays.)

Did Stephen Hawkings say the Universe created itself? It would seem very odd that a physicist would say something about the creation of the Universe.

Comment Re: A fool and their money (Witching Sticks) (Score 1) 266

Common sense isn't always right. I don't see a good mechanism, but I'm not going to assume dowsing won't work without a decent study. Currently, I figure it's an interesting story with some not-particularly-convincing evidence, but I have no actual need to either believe it works or believe it doesn't.

Comment Re: A fool and their money (Score 1) 266

If dowsing did work, why do you think scientists would necessarily investigate? There's lots of stories that tend to be overlooked by science (typically for good reasons). Now, it doesn't cost much to get some equipment to check out haunted houses, so amateurs can do it. It would be very expensive to test properly, as somebody would have to get enough land and drill both dowsed spots and control spots.

Comment Re: A fool and their money (Score 1) 266

The traditional method is to use a forked stick, so it isn't a magnetic field. If it works (and I've seen comments for and against), it works by making it easy for some sort of subconscious feeling trigger something observable. This would mean that there are some perceptions that get processed unconsciously to make the whatever move or jump. At this point, I'm leaving it to somebody else to figure out what perceptions those could be.

Comment Re:9 to 5 is a myth (Score 1) 146

Depends on the company and the job. A lunch break is mandatory under certain circumstances (which should not be construed as meaning everybody gets one, of course), but it doesn't legally have to be paid.

My pay does not depend on my exact hours, so if I come in at 9, take an hour lunch, and leave at 5, the worst that will happen is that the boss will tell me to work more. (Of course, I don't get overtime when crunch time hits and I need to get something done before going home, but that's rare.)

Slashdot Top Deals

To write good code is a worthy challenge, and a source of civilized delight. -- stolen and paraphrased from William Safire

Working...