So a butterfly farting in Canada won't have any effect in the US? This isn't a butterfly effect scenario, though, this is simple thermodynamics. The energy you get bleeds from the current store. Change the flow enough in places, and other places will feel the effect.

But the prez is not, and the GOP is. Strange that you would bring this up.

I agree. If the rule of law still applied, and there was Justice in this land, she would be in prison right now.

You don't need my Physics degree to understand that. Try opening your mind and learning a little physical science.

We disagree.

When I worked for PG&E I saw the sulfur emission at the geothermal plant in Norcal. The entire plant, and road, and the field out to the main road was yellow. This is a problem.

We can only power about 10% of the US with wind before we are disrupting the jet stream. Small amount of wind power is good, sure. But it is fated to be a small portion.

Actually Bill Clinton lead the largest peace time expansion of our economy.

I don't have a Tesla, but I thank you and everyone who helps move us to electric cars. I'd like to see Exxon stock holders taxed at a higher rate to support Tesla.

Electric cars won't use fossil fuel once we go nuclear.

Just don't fire someone for race, creed, or color, and you'll be OK.

So public protest is fine so long as it is neither public nor effective?

Freedom of speech does apply to governments, not business. However, public opinion applies to both.

Airwaves are a public resource, and so privately owned issues pretty much end where they hit the antenna. I'd make the argument that it isn't in the public interest to promote crazyness. I support the public interest, but that doesn't mean every whack-o's mutterings are worthy of promotion.

We do research, but we don't build anything with the results of our research. Nuclear Reactors that can't meltdown are old hat at the US research level.