Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment They STILL haven't switched to Proof of Stake? (Score 3, Insightful) 57

How long have they been doing "any minute now" with Proof of Stake? They've been certainly using its "coming soon" status as a dodge for all of 2020 and 2021 to counteract the narrative that all crypto really does is waste energy.

If they couldn't tie it into an actual hard fork of the coin, how serious about switching are they?

Comment Re:Delayed response (Score 1) 205

Whatever makes you think HIPAA has the remotest relevance in whichever jurisdiction I'm in?

Psst: I don't actually give a shit.

Whatever makes you think HIPAA would be the only law even in jurisdictions in which it does apply?

Because there IS no other law in HIPAA jurisdictions that would apply in this situation?

99% of the people on the internet who speak/write English and claim that they're legally protected from being asked about vaccination status are A) Americans who think B) HIPAA applies in that situation and therefore C) are wrong. So congrats on being part of the 1%.

Comment Re:Mandatory Fun (Score 3, Insightful) 104

It's exactly this kind of FOMO shit that causes Americans, as a group, to not take all the vacation time they're owed, or to bust their ass for more than 40 hours a week, every week, at a salaried position, with the promise of a raise or promotion that mysteriously never comes because of "cutbacks".

If 37 of you went to a bar, do you think anything useful is getting done? No? So why would it be different over Zoom? You're going to hear the leader, or a few leaders, bloviate because they like to hear themselves talk, and that's an hour of your life you're not getting back.

Comment Re: Seems ok (Score 1) 179

Again... if he hadn't deliberately registered a domain name that would cause confusion with a much larger company HE ALREADY KNEW EXISTED, we wouldn't have heard of this guy. NONE of his companies were just called "Nissan". The company name in question was Nissan Computers. So why did the domain name absolutely-no-compromise have to be "nissan.com"? Because he thought he could get some monetary consideration from it like the rest of the domain squatting dirtbags that were all over the place in the late 90s and early 2000s, and it blew up in his face.

Comment Re:Seems ok (Score 1) 179

Except he didn't. Nissan.com goes to Nissan Computer's web site - which is plastered with information about the lawsuit that you have to get past to get to his computer services. NissanUSA.com goes to Nissan Motor's US web site.

And I'd have a LITTLE more sympathy for the guy if he hadn't registered the domain name nissan.com knowing Goddamn well a major car company was using it for the past five years. Why couldn't he just be nissancomputer.com? Every other Nissan related name on the net - and there are lots - has something else as part of the domain name, and Nissan Motors didn't go after them. Nissan Motors even registered that domain and offered it to him for free and said in print there wouldn't be a lawsuit if he had differentiation in his domain name. Clearly he was counting on the domain confusion for ad click throughs.

Slashdot Top Deals

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...