Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Steve Jobs wasn't any different... apk (Score 1) 179

Woz was very brilliant but he wasn't very practical.

Steve Jobs was a genius in his own right, but not necessarily the hacker/engineer of Woz -- but he worked very closely with design engineers.

His name is on hundreds of patents and that's not because he sat back and just signed them.

Woz alone would never have created anything like Apple, and Steve Jobs without Woz could not have either -- in life, we can't be good at everything, and it's a perfect storm if you can find people who can help you where you are weak.

But don't compare Jobs to Balmer -- that's unfair and ridiculous.

Comment Re:Step #1 Find a Geek (Score 2) 179

He just followed Bill Gates example;

Step #1, Join a group of geeks creating Basic

Step #2, Copyright their openly shared work and then sue them.

Step #3, Hire a hacker to steal CP/M and reelable the drive letters, then repeat the "steal IP and then sue them" procedure

Step #4, Repeat the taking of other's ideas and then buy their stock when it collapses then stop suing yourself.

Step #5, Act like a good lawyer repeatedly and have everyone call you a geek.

Step #6, Retire in luxury and donate some money to some causes instead of pointing out that a thousand other millionaires might have allowed other people to feel achievement rather than put someone on a pedestal who was just a savvy predatory capitalist.

Comment Re:McDonallds should sue ... (Score 0) 251

So this is it then, we've accepted that when the grizzled wild eyed man comes from the bowls of some mega corp and screams; "Soylent Green is PEOPLE!" That he will then add, with no change in tempo; "...And as a result, we'd like to offer our customers a 30% discount on burgers."

We're all on board with this because if we don't upsell everyone's dog, at all times, we don't get any burgers, even if they are made of grandma.

Comment Re:Advert? (Score 1) 129

OK, so it's kind of like Crossover Games -- it creates a wrapper with everything that an app (game) needs from an OS, but doesn't require the entire OS.

You are basically then allocating memory and feeding tasks to the wrapper without expending resources you don't need. To describe what it can and cannot do, all you can say is; "it depends."

Is that about right?

Comment Re:god dammit. (Score 1) 521

That's if you accept what the Corporate PR said about the Exxon Valdez -- and you ignore the 1000x incidents like this that get no press.

The on solar incident that is killing birds also doesn't have the "unknown unknowns' there aren't that many unintended consequences down the line.

The Valdez spill continues to have SOME ecological impact. It also wasn't cause by a drunken sea captain - that was the cover story that they adopted and likely the captain got compensated for. The COMPANY POLICY was that they turned off all the radar and sonar systems that they PROMISED the Inuit that they would have on to protect the wild life. The Inuit went for protection of wildlife, over levying a large toll on this profit making venture.

Exxon saved money paying for the trial and underpaying and stalling the payouts -- some people just died of old age waiting to collect. Having to pay for all the safety procedures was more expensive than a guaranteed cataclysm.

I just wanted to point that out while all the pro oil and pro nuclear people gloat about extrapolating bird deaths that someone admitted to vs. bird deaths that PR agencies are never going to admit to. We pay trillions to a military to procure oil profits and we will be paying for 2000 years to safeguard mothballed nuclear plants and so I'm going to debate people on "cost of Kilowatt" when all the stats are lies and damn lies that we compare our apples and oranges to.

We do not really know the cost of most of these dirty fuels, but we do hear a lot of happy talk about it and comparisons to "worst case scenarios" for alternative energy. Birds killed by concentrated light -- I'm so surprised! Put up some fake owls on poles -- impact reduced.

Comment Re:What a joke, considering the site's intent (Score 1) 748

"knee jerking white knight mangina useful idiots swooping in"

Nobody would call you a hater -- to your face, within range of your shotgun which is reasonably attached to the gun rack on the side of your laptop. Nobody.

Since I'm on the internet, I'll just say; "it's a private website, and they can have any stupid policy they want." Just saying. Just calmly saying with no anti or pro intent. I'm putting down my pen -- it's just a pen.

I'm backing away from my keyboard now. Slowly.

Comment Re:Good Job NRC (Score 1) 66

> However I would really hope the actual dangerous stuff isn't on the same network that allows any sort of internet access.

You spelled Nuclear correctly, but if you want the DOH (Department Of Hope), it's down the hall between the DOWT (Department Of Wishful Thinking) and OMGTWB (Oh My God-That Went Boom!)

Comment Re:Time for medicare for all in the usa (Score 1) 171

No, there is a "nearly free" lunch if you are a multinational corporation or an executive attached to one.

The REAL average tax rate of fortune 500 companies is 13%. That's what Mitt Romney pays -- well, the income we KNOW about.

The last stat I looked at showed that the government paid around 52% of all medical expenses. And administrative costs at hospitals were around 42%.

What should we learn from this? In the US our cost is about twice to four times as much for healthcare as other civilized countries. More than half of this money is just going into the pockets of insurance companies, drug companies (charging more here than they do abroad and drugs that cost pennies to cows cost dollars to humans). HMOs and Hospitals. There are middle men in the equation.

The blame is getting spread around, but it's all about who gets the money. And it isn't the doctors or the patients -- the people actually involved.

We already have paid more than enough for Universal Health care, but there are corporations and wealthy that have removed their money from the system and there are fat cats making the money and getting us to look to blame the wrong parites. Why would they want to SOLVE this situation -- the FREE LUNCH is working out great for a lot of people with a lot of money.

Comment Re:Very subjective (Score 4, Insightful) 382

I couldn't agree more. In an insane world, the sane blogger must appear as a troll!

Huffingtonpost.com forced a policy change that required a Facebook login. I don't want my opinions to tag me, like my credit rating. Eventually, if I've got any opinions that don't follow the "common and popular" I can create a self-reinforcing negative reputation.

Having what you really think follow you isn't good for being employed. And being unemployed isn't good for a credit rating. And a bad credit rating means insurance costs more. It's a really effective way to make dissidents "non persons" over time.

Anonymity on the internet is the last refuge of Democracy. If we cannot protest and voice our complaints anonymously -- then the only people who will get good reputations and jobs will be those that agree with the status quo.

Comment Re:Obvious (Score 1) 151

I think the greatest speed limitation now is our "computing dimensions" -- we are still using binary logic in the computer. For instance, if we moved to optical computing -- sure the structures would get larger, and there are density issues, but if you can create a binary logic gate for each color, your "dimension" of computing is limited only by the frequencies you can discern. You add massive parallelism.

Now if we can move from binary logic at the same time, more computing work can get done per cpu cycle. In this case, the main limitation is coming up with a new computer logic to accommodate more than an off/on state.

And for data storage, holographic also is less "dense" than current hard drives, but you can add angles, and so more data can be stored in the same location.

Comment Re:Potheads assemble! (Score 1) 178

But if this is 1/700,000 -- you are below the danger level of side effects to Aspirin.
Peanuts are legal and they can potentially kill more people.

Now we might put a warning label so people can look for the side effects, but this doesn't seem like a threat above "slipping on rubber ducky". Other than paranoia, this is about the third time I've heard of a person almost destroyed by MJ. There are many legal things that are far more dangerous.

Slashdot Top Deals

Biology is the only science in which multiplication means the same thing as division.

Working...