The last thing you need is the platform to fragment and then start catering for different versions of the software........oops too late!
So let me get this straight.
Google say something like "honeycomb source wll be released 'at some point in the future'" while specific hardware manufacturers get access to the source code for their devices - interestingly "cheap"/smaller (e.g chinese) brands do not(?).
Google now say "we won't bother releasing the source code for honeycomb".
Google then say "we'll release the source code to ICS - but not yet" - specific hardware manufacturers get access to the source code. Everyone else has to wait.
Google's definition stretches the idea of "Open source" to it's limits. It's very "orwellian" - "some people are more equal than others"
I get the feeling that manufacturers are putting pressure on Google to protect their markets. You can't have "just anyone" producing android devices with the latest features.
It must be just me but generally with open source software everyone gets access to the source code in its current state. If you want a working, "predictable" version then you download the "stable" branch.
Google + android = open source fail.
At least with Apple you generally know where you stand.........(what did I just say!??)
Just want to say thank-you for keepin an old burnt-out programmer entertained for the past 14 years.
"All your base are belong to us!"
I've been folowing the mono project for years and think it is a great open source project.
However, if I want to write
The SDK for Android is free and fully supported yet I'm expected to $399 for mono on android?
I know the major benefit is supposed to be a "cross-platform" development environment but charging for the runtime seems a bit braindead to me!
By all means charge for the other stuff (e.g. IDE integration, support and updates) that's fair but "locking away" the runtime is a bit cheeky and limiting adoption.
The security issue is a valid question.
In one of the links in the summary it shows that the video memory can be read and get a snapshot of the user's desktop (in the example a confidential document is viewable) - exceptionally bad. Use an exploit like this with something else means their is potential for a severe security breach.
Then again it's early stages and I'm sure the security issues will be resolved in time.
It's an exciting techology especially with regard to streaming games over the internet.
Who remembers VRML???
That is the best advice someone can give you - makes an enormous amount of sense!
ScuzzMonkey, you have my respect - wise words.
Waste not, get your budget cut next year.