Comment Yeah, the biometrics companies... (Score 2) 328
Have GOT to be loving this decision. I hope nobody here on
Have GOT to be loving this decision. I hope nobody here on
... that they're interested to hear peoples' reasons for not voting?
...because over there someone is doing something obviously much worse! That's how it works, right?
More recently, the sleeping 7-year-old girl shot in the head during a no-knock raid in Detroit.
That's why it's good that you read it.
...and if you ban things that are similar to child pornography couldn't you also ban images of women with small breasts because they evoke thoughts of children? (paraphrase)
Kind of like Australia, then?
That's a terrible name. What are they, fourteen?
Imagine that. A city council is capable of making both bad and good decisions. How novel!
Stop that. You're falling into the Just World fallacy. There is no karma, there is no divine retribution, there's no just desserts. There's only us. What goes around doesn't come around, unless people make it happen.
Every defendant is also innocent until proven guilty, so of course they're going to defend themselves. Your method is "we've arrested you, therefore you must be guilty and shouldn't bother with a defense."
Well, with the exception of a random, message-length one-time pad. Technically even that can be brute-forced, but even then you have no way of telling which result is the original message.
"Also, there are rumors at KSC..."
Whoa whoa, I'm not sure you guys want the Kerbals to be building rockets for you...
No, see... they get all the protections of common carrier status, but none of the responsibilities. Because reasons. Many billions of reasons.
Your attacker almost certainly has their weapon ready before you do, even when you have a normal firearm. You go for your gun. Your attacker kills you.
... from the pro-gun lobby. Because nothing says reasonable discourse like threatening to kill people.
To understand a program you must become both the machine and the program.
