I'm bewildered that anyone would take anything Jezzer says seriously.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
"Hey terrorists are scary and we need new laws, so lets commit terrorism so we can make these new laws!" XD
... No standing.
Everywhere you go, in all things.
... and then they get a pittance of a fine and go about continuing to do business.
Assuming you make it to trial.
Score: 5 is way too low for this comment.
I was always fond of playing the Scumbag Humans(tm), sucking up all friendly-like to whoever was in the lead and 'helpfully' placing 'defensive' fleets (strangely consisting entirely of planetary bombardment designs and troop transports) around my ally's planets. __
To anyone for whom interstellar travel is feasible, 'limited resources' isn't a thing that exists. There's literally nothing to fight over. Well, realistically speaking. A game in no way has to be (or should necessarily be) realistic.
I'm still bewildered that Firaxis actually cannot find a way to make a turn-based game function in multiplayer. I'm pretty sure like every other developer on the planet has managed this feat, but somehow not Firaxis.
I guess they want to lock it away someplace safe to make sure no terrorism gets on it or anything. XD
I'm pretty certain thermal imaging was already ruled a 'search' and required a warrant, so I'm not sure why using active radar is even a question to this judge...
He was a guest on Top Gear, that counts right?
This reminds me that one can be disqualified for being hired as a police officer for scoring too high on an IQ test.
I imagine the beam diameter is larger at the source, converging on the target. This keeps the flux(?) low enough at the source not to incinerate its own optics.