Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"closure?" (Score 1) 113

Anecdotally, it seems to be blocked for some people and not for others, and the blocking itself seems to be in flux. The last time I saw a post on Slashdot saying it had been closed, I tried accessing it then and could not. This time around, I can access the website. Don't know about the torrent though, haven't tried.

Meant to say *tracker* - heh. Maybe I shouldn't slashdot without my green tea :)

Comment Re:"closure?" (Score 1) 113

Anecdotally, it seems to be blocked for some people and not for others, and the blocking itself seems to be in flux. The last time I saw a post on Slashdot saying it had been closed, I tried accessing it then and could not. This time around, I can access the website. Don't know about the torrent though, haven't tried.

Submission + - Mac OS X 10.6.2 Will NOT Block Atom Processors (tumblr.com)

pcaylor writes: It looks like the reports of Apple disabling support of Atom processors in Mac OS 10.6.2 was premature. The latest developer build of 10.6.2 (10C535) apparently works fine on Atom based systems. As Stell's Blog writes:
Wow, didn't expect to get linked all over the internet for this damn post. Anyways, in the latest development build Atom appears to have resurrected itself zombie style in 10C535. The Atom lives another day, but nothing is concrete until the final version of 10.6.2 is out.

Perhaps people shouldn't freak out quite so much when unsupported processors break in an development build.

Comment First Impression (Score 1) 2

So...who else is wondering what was wrong with the old name?

I guess I'll come around eventually. The new name isn't so terrible, it's just..."SourceForge" conjures up images of an awesome factory somewhere churning out code, while "GeekNet" just...sounds like another attempt at social networking. Oh well... yay for branding...

Submission + - SourceForge Changes Name to Geeknet (geek.net) 2

Joren writes: SourceForge, Inc., a company responsible for such sites as SourceForge, ThinkGeek , Ohloh, and our very own Slashdot, today announced that it has changed its name to Geeknet, Inc. Scott L. Kauffman, President & CEO of Geeknet, stated that "Our new name is a more accurate articulation of our business. With Geeknet as our calling card on Madison Avenue, we are now able to clearly define the audience we serve and more effectively capture the business opportunity that we are addressing."
The Military

Submission + - US Military Requests 'National Manhunting Agency' (wired.com) 2

Philip K Dickhead writes: "The US Military Joint Operations University says that a "National Manhunting Agency” is needed to go after jihadists, drug dealers, pirates and other "enemies of the state". Revelations of a CIA program for extrajudicial executions and assassination are criticized for not going far enough in the military's position. "Such a group wouldn’t just go after terrorists. “Human networks are behind narcotics trafficking, arms proliferation, piracy, hiding war criminals from authorities, human trafficking, or other smuggling activities,” Crawford writes. “Human networks also lie at the core of national governments, offering an increased potential to nonlethally influence state actors with precision. A robust manhunting capability would allow the United States to interdict these human networks.”"
Given the military and law enforcements history of mission-creep, are "hackers" Gary McKinnon about to show up on a hit-list?"

Comment Re:Kinda sounds like (Score 1) 118

The fact that so many people chime in with "I don't get it" is probably an indication of how revolutionary it is.

...or of it just being poorly articulated.

I'm not a Wave hater, but a lot of the coverage I read initially was really vague about what it actually is. Even after the .com bubble, it seems a lot of people are willing to make the assumption that vague vibes of goodness and a lack of details makes for something revolutionary - if it can't be explained well, then it must be cool.

In this case though it turns out Wave actually is cool. It just needs to be explained better, and we're beginning to see some of that implementation now.

Comment Re:This isn't going to help (Score 5, Interesting) 200

Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.

Compared to? Cats? An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't? A cherrypicked group of humans?

Just try getting between a cat and a plate of tuna. They are fiendishly inventive... I have a cat that, while not necessarily socially intelligent, was quite clever at solving problems. He might fit in here at Slashdot ;) - One day when I was in my last year of high school, the cat, while wondering why in the world he was not getting petted and catered to, decided it was time to take matters into his own paws. Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time, he figured out how to reset my computer - never mind the fact that the front panel had been completely removed and the reset "switch" consisted of a button deeply recessed into a 7mm opening in the grating, of which there were dozens to choose from. He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of work. He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen, I'd have more time to pay attention to him. He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day...

Comment Correction (Score 1) 501

However, suppose we were to assume a 25 mile radius, instead...given that 40/45 seems optimistic, as you noted. 1,963.49541 sq. miles, divided into America's size would give us 1,932.3 towers needed to blanket the nation, at 0.0005% coverage per tower, ignoring overlap and ignoring existing towers. Of which, the executive contribution would cover 15.360% of the nation.

gahhhh it's 0.05% coverage per tower, not 0.0005%. Got mixed up between percent and decimal...these errors are infectious!

Comment Re:Sure.. that will build 1 thousandth of the towe (Score 1) 501

Eh... the 1/10 of 1 percent figure applies only to one tower. Your guesstimate has the number of towers being almost 300. So actually, 0.167656546 % coverage per tower (we're not counting for the inevitable overlap between towers) * 296 towers = 49.6263 % - almost half of the nation. We're also ignoring the already existing towers, of course, but these would be a welcome supplement in any case.

However, suppose we were to assume a 25 mile radius, instead...given that 40/45 seems optimistic, as you noted. 1,963.49541 sq. miles, divided into America's size would give us 1,932.3 towers needed to blanket the nation, at 0.0005% coverage per tower, ignoring overlap and ignoring existing towers. Of which, the executive contribution would cover 15.360% of the nation.

Comment Re:Impressive! (Score 1) 82

Sorry for OT. I wanted to send a private message but I couldn't find out how to do that on Slashdot.

Plastbox, your website is spewing out errors as fast as available bandwidth will let it, and I don't think you want to get billed for all that bandwidth. Here's a sample:
.

Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: unable to connect to 81.191.94.248:10000 (Connection refused) in /var/www/org/plastbox/root/index.php on line 24 Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /var/www/org/plastbox/root/index.php on line 25 Warning: feof(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /var/www/org/plastbox/root/index.php on line 26 Warning: fread(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /var/www/org/plastbox/root/index.php on line 28 Warning: feof(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /var/www/org/plastbox/root/index.php on line 26 ...ad infinitum

Comment Re:downloading a file sharing program will be ille (Score 4, Informative) 82

Just read about it in the newspaper. (Daily Yomiuri, for me.)

Unfortunately, the on-line version leaves off a few things.

For instance, Kaneko's lawyer's pointed out that auto manufacturers would not "be punished if speeding became rampant." (Reported in the print news.)

Also, the on-line version doesn't mention that, "A revised Copyright Law that prohibits users from downloading such peer-to-peer file sharing software will come into force in January." (The last line of the print article.)

I think the print version of the Yomiuri may have been slightly off on that point... the sources I have seem to say the law is dealing with copyrighted works, not programs that can be used to download them. Copyright act amended

Japan Strengthens Copyright Law Basically, the new legal ground seems to be that downloading works protected by copyright without permission is now officially a crime, but they have to prove the defendent knew the file was not distributed legally. Up until now, prosecution has been mostly (if not completely?) uploaders. Nothing is being said about downloading the software itself.

If you want it from the original source, and you can read Japanese, this link has the text of the bill itself in PDF format. I have not translated it so I can't verify whether the English news sources are correct in their interpretation or not.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...