Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Blender (Score 4, Informative) 84

If you are a talented coder who has an interested in graphics; simulation; animation; painting; video editing; digital compositing; game engines; AI; or just about anything else related to 3D animation; video editing and compositing; or games you might consider applying for Blender.

Here is a preliminary list of ideas, we are open to suggestions (in general only half of the proposals we recieve are items on the list) especially if it is something that you worked on for a school project.

http://wiki.blender.org/index.php?title=Dev:Ref/GoogleSummerOfCode/2011/Ideas

Comment Re:Not sure what their priorities are. (Score 1) 369

[quote]Contrary to popular science fiction, electronics and radiation don't mix well.
The robots they tried to use at Chernobyl stopped working almost immediately.[/quote]

Electronics can be hardened to 10,000 krad tolerance and you can use boron and lead shielding. Robotics have been sucessfully used to explore inside the Chernobyl sarcophagus. We have the technological capabilities to do the required hardware.

Comment Re:Shutting down nuke plants is a bit foolish (Score 3, Insightful) 369

Yes, MIT, which brought us the widely quoted "why-i-am-not-worried-about-japans-nuclear-reactors" blog post early on. What's that? You can't find "why-i-am-not-worried-about-japans-nuclear-reactors?" Oh, it seems mitnse.com has taken that highly rosy, bright and shiny optimistic tract down.

You mean this post?

http://mitnse.com/2011/03/13/modified-version-of-original-post/

Still seems to be there. (The original was posted at the blog mortagesatlarge since it was an email to freinds and family - it moved to the MIT blog since the original author found ou it had been publically posted, and asked them to check it for accuracy and if they would be willing to host it)

Probably because the disaster that it dismissed has slowly happened. You can read that original post with a little googling. Pay close attention to the "worst-case-scenario" at the end.

I've read it, the worst case scenario was with respect to the reactors. The problems we are seeing, which was not discussed in the original post (and at the time of the articles writing were not known to be an issue), are with the cooling beds for spent fuel, not the reactors.

Comment Re:What the heck? (Score 1) 292

But let me put your central assertion to the most obvious test. I write the Great American Novel. It's an awesome novel. It's breathtaking, ground-breaking, and lots of other "aking" things. But I'm eccentric. So I write it entirely as a C++ comment block, and in a file called "GreatAmericanNovel.hpp".

Your comments are expressive, so would be copyrightable. The parts of a header file that are not copyrightable are the 'merely functional' parts - which likely would generally be held to be function prototypes and typical stuff in a header.

A comment that describes the function might or might not be copyrightable but I think it probably would be - depends on the comment.

I read your source - he doesn't really address the 'functional' clause which addresses what is excluded from possible copyright, which is rather critical to this discussion.

Not a lawyer, etc.

Comment Re:What the heck? (Score 1) 292

The majority of the linux kernel headers ARE copyrighted. Look for yourself. Perhaps you are trying to make a claim that "headers are not copyrightable", but that would be crazy.

Having a copyright notice does not mean something is copyrighted, it just means a copyright claim is being asserted. In US law 'merely functional' elements are not copyrightable. It is argued that headers are 'merely functional' and hence not subject to copyright. (That doesn't mean that a header could not contain some copyrightable elements such as comments describing the function, but the core of header files - function definitions - are 'merely functional' and thus not copyrightable).

Comment Re:the core of the issue (Score 1) 292

That "technical process" looks like it refers to an automated filter that it ran the standard Linux header files through, resulting in part of the API for the non-GPL Bionic Library used in application development. One reading of copyright law could determine that the Bionic Library is a direct derivative of the Linux Kernel and therefore must be GPLv2 and open source. This library is essential for Android application development, therefore it would become legally impossible to develop a closed-source Android app.

Personally, my reading of GPLv2 tells me that simply including GPLv2 header files does not mean that your application must also be GPLv2 (otherwise a large part of the embedded market simply wouldn't exist). So I'm marking this one down as FUD.

As pointed out above - header files are likely not copyrightable in the US.

Also something that violates the GPL does not mean that the remedy is to make any work that violates the copyright of a GPLed work also GPLed. If you violate the GPL, then it terminates your right to distribute and makes you a copyright violator - the remedy for which is typically economic damages.

IANAL - but I'm fairly sure that your post is mostly incorrect.

Comment Re:I hate people who are good at handling people (Score 1) 298

My suspicion is that it's especially common in managers used to environments where there is always a bit of "flexibility" (if an employee says "it can't be done" it means "it will be hard to do", if an employee says "three weeks" it means "two weeks with less time in the break room") who end up managing developers and IT people and don't understand that when their "The decision has already been made by management, we will [foo]" gets a "That's not possible, not just with the current state of computing but most likely not with our current understanding of the laws of physics" that's generally not negotiable, it really means that it's impossible.

Well sometimes 'that's impossible' just means that they don't know how to do it or misunderstood the request or they track their mind went down when they tried to think of a solution was the wrong track. I've had three or four times where programmers I've been working with have told me something is 'impossible' then I give a few hours thought and provide them with an algorithm for it. (These are highly skilled programmers too, not html monkeys but top 1% C and python programmers).

Comment Re:Open-source--but Maya? (Score 4, Informative) 36

Maya? Not the open-source Blender?

The important part was Motionbuilder. Right now Blender doesn't have the tools for dealing with motion capture to give 'clean' results from mocap data. Thus until such time as our tools for mocap improve Blender won't be a suitable choice. Maya can import easily the files output by Maya.

Comment Re:Legit (Score 5, Informative) 294

Seriously though, they did add notes to all of the images naming the source. Maybe they asked permission, and that was all the creators asked of them? I'd advise we hold off on the lynching until one of the artists comes out and complains.

No they did not ask permission. We specifically denied them to use of some of the images and of our videos (some are CC licensed and thus we have no control over, but many are not). However he has ignored most of the requests from the Blender Foundation.

Comment Re:Legit (Score 4, Informative) 294

His customers appear happy, and given that he's marketing to die-hard Windows & Mac users (no Linux version mentioned), the fee probably makes them feel more comfortable. It's a feature...

" Wow this software is incredible. I have owned Maya, 3DMax and PoserPro. I can tell you, this is by FAR, the easiest software to use."

Isaac Oneil - Marion, NC

He creates false testimonials (I reported him to one of the corporations he was using in a false testimonial - he had fabricated the individual and testimony.)

Slashdot Top Deals

One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.

Working...