you have had your freedom to vote for the government, you have had your freedom to vote for those who makes laws, you have had your freedom to vote for the people in charge of the city, now by your freedom they have made it illegal, in practice you have made this happen with your freedom

this is most probably so if editors who are caught doing stuff when being paid for it and not disclosing it can have all that they have done removed without the need to do a investigation if what they wrote is truth or not

if you stop you have still started and that should be enough service is not the same as a product in this case and is covered by other laws/regulations, I think even when buying food has it owns laws/regulation

gifts

Was it needed in 1979?, only ones I could guess who needed that kind of cryptodisk software would have been governments at most?, as probably most system were closed off and there was no internet to speak of, thus the need for cryptodisk and combined with how slow computers were and the need of disk space thys making cryptodisk deemed a cost that you dont need to put any money into.

I dont know why people say that other civ's would see us as complete idiots if they followed our history, I would say it would be more likely that other civilisation that could see us would say, ohh look, they are doing exact the same things as we did x years ago

systeminfo and logininfo, even if most likely all logininfo is invalid, how system works and are connected to other system/internet is quite valuable to know

what he wants is everything and cheap, will not happen if it is not supported as kindle is by amazon that can sell it cheap because it lacks all those above

what I could understand was that they cried because they don't get others money to do games with and that their games get competition from freemium games

What do you think ground means or refers to?

yeah, like a itching rash by the bite

Even if things are painfully obvious there is no guarantee that they are the first choice of use, or the best. And then there is that you have to show which one is best to convince the backward people who claims another inferior way is better because they always have done it that way/always been like that. I would guess people like you are one of them. But that is just a guess and I guess we will need a study to show that or is it painfully obvious?

So you mean we have to get rid of internet?

It may be so, but you can see how good it works with being anonymous for the people it should protect when in fact it doesn't because people are jerks when they think they can get away with it.

it works great :)