Really have you read the latest from the dumbfuck running the CDC? Would you consider the Washington Post a good source of information?

Inept and incompetent and I'm sorry but a mia culpa isn't going to cut it.

Only if you need to be treated at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital.

They've demonstrated themselves to be completely incompetent. Eric Duncan should have been transported to a hospital with the equipment and expertise to deal with quarantining highly infectious disease.

So... a knowledgeable person scripts it, and a regular user runs the script.

Tell that to the nurse in Dallas who used full biohazard protective gear and still got Ebola.

Nothing works well when you rely on the government to do it. Too slow, too inefficient, too pc.

Can we get through Ebola, first, and then worry about whether coastal military bases might need to be relocated to higher ground decades in the future?

Let's re-evaluate your statement with the key information that you omitted in your post: * 334kJ/kg for water to melt it * 418kJ/kg for water to raise from 0C to 100C * 2257 J/g is the heat of vaporization of water

You'll notice that the heat of vaporization is an order of magnitude larger than your other metrics. Thus, it is much much harder to boil water than to melt it!

Here's another way of asking that question:

With this revelation will the government support me putting a 17-year old idiot behind bars for killing a loved one of mine with distracted driving?

With the prevalence of cell phones today (for those counting, that would be ALL drivers on the road) and the average persons ignorance (it'll never happen to me), a deadly accident isn't a matter of if, it's a matter of when.

Here's how I do it: http://osxdaily.com/2014/02/16...

Timtowtdi of course

Can't innovate man. The tech is covered by patents.

You're not allowed to build your own Siri from scratch.

Give me a break, "they do what they do in India Russia and China because it's the right thing to do."

They follow the law over there while trying to make a buck, same as we do here.

Don't blame our people for obeying the law.

April 28, 2003 12:16 PM PDT
Apple unveils music store
...
The songs cost 99 cents each to download, with no subscription fee, and include the most liberal copying rights of any online service to date. Jobs has been an outspoken opponent of so-called digital rights management (DRM) in the past, arguing that limitations on digital music will undermine the market for legitimate content.

I'm not sure if this is true...IIRC I started buying music from Amazon because it's music did not carry DRM while Apple's still did.