Let me break out the categories where women are leading tech adoption: mobile phone location-based services
So we still beat them at map-reading ? nice
Seeing how video codecs store the difference between frames instead of frames themselves except for keyframes, and there would be less differences in 48 fps than 24 fps version, would there actually be any advantages to this?
There's most definitely a difference. Motion estimation for compression does not find motion vectors which describe the real motion very well, they just compress very well. It's a world of difference, most TV's nowadays do motion estimation themselves to convert to >=120Hz. Which, especially for panning motion is a huge improvement over 24 Hz. Note that you only see the difference if you track objects/people with your eye. When you focus your eyes statically at the center of the screen, 24 Hz is enough
"It's the best thing since professional golfers on 'ludes." -- Rick Obidiah