Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Would you care to rephrase that? (Score 1) 92

FTFS: "...terminals would draw one character at a time by covering the page in black and then revealing each character by erasing a character-sized rectangle from that cover, one-by-one, line-by-line."

I don't know of any terminals that ever worked that way.

They didn't.

I think what that poorly worded sentence meant to say was "... the developers simulated how terminals would draw one character at a time ..."
FTFY

Comment Re:not to scale = not impressed (Score 1) 67

Had they mentioned it I wouldn't have bothered reading the article, let alone download the map.

I have a map of the United States... Actual size. It says, "Scale: 1 mile = 1 mile." I spent last summer folding it. I also have a full-size map of the world. I hardly ever unroll it. People ask me where I live, and I say, "E6". -- Stephen Wright

Comment Re:Completely insane... (Score 1) 202

Exactly. There are many stories (and well worth reading) pointing at numerous 'edge' cases where the three laws can get a little ambiguous. I.e. since a robot should never allow a person to come to harm, through action or inaction. However, should a robot allow itself to come to harm (probably through inaction) if the robot determines that the person will come to harm anyway? And how do you tell if the robot breaks Law 1 in this case?

That, detective, is the right question. Program terminated.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...