Skipping past the rude jokes, what difference does that make?
At a deeper level, it seems you are asserting that humanity bootstrapped to full sexual reproduction, substantially in agreement with Genesis. You're not denying Evolution, like one of them Progress-denying Fundamentalist knuckle draggers are you?

Let's go back to where you said

The 'point' == http
Simple laws of physics sustain all == getting on the internet

My contention is that you can't really even evaluate 'sustain all' without at least tacitly accepting the existence of the underlying 'point' of life.
But we've previously circled this drain. I think you're either (a) trolling, or (b) a fool. And I really don't care which is the case.

That was pure hypothetical. I ain't leavin'.

Bless your heart!

Sweet, sweet Progress. Great to see you in the 'hood. No, things haven't changed much.

Communism seeks to put people on the path of ultimate truth and offers life past death? The More You Know. . .

Denying the clear sense of my point is one way of replying, if not responding.

Bureaucracy is all about the passive voice. Hence my hatred thereof.

Were I to entertain emigration thoughts, I'll venture I'd opt for New Zealand.

Show proof.

Psalm 51.

You are as a man who gets on the internet to deny the existence of HTTP.

Amusingly, you continue to behave as though life had some point, while both (a) denying the possibility of such, and (b) assuming a pose of tired wisdom.
But we've flogged both them ponies pretty dead already.

Win what? If I'm running for anything, it's the exit.