Superman Returns made $200M+ domestically, was the 6th highest grossing film of 2006, and made more than Wolverine did 3 years earlier, which means it sold many more tickets. Just because it's budget was high doesn't mean a decent gross makes it a flop. I'm sure they wanted it to make a billion dollars, but close to $400M in 2006 was pretty good.
I explained Green Lantern in a post above. Still, it did gross over $100M. The poster's point was that flops of superhero movies happen, but they are rare.
Lone Ranger was a bad idea from the start - no name recognition with most of the movie-going audience, and your only star is unrecognizable? Plus, it's not a superhero movie.
Weird tastes? Just since the beginning of the year I have watched (by streaming) the following: Cheers, The Office, Breaking Bad, Psych, Burn Notice, Frasier, Archer, several not-very-obscure British series (Sherlock, etc...), and perhaps a dozen mainstream (made actual money when theatrically released) movies, Hunger Games and MI:4 included. I see nothing "weird" in that list. Perhaps you need to revisit Netflix.com.
The "savings on warehouse and postage" they "keep for themselves" is put towards the enormous bandwidth that this article is about, plus some profit that companies are supposed to make for their shareholders.
Problem is, (1). surely the Police should be sorting out these problems rather than individuals taking the law into their own hands
As the saying goes, "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away." These individuals are not "taking the law into their own hands". They are taking their lives into their own hands.
And it is not the police's job to protect citizens. See Warren v. District of Columbia
> I don't think you know what "spurious" means. If you pay for three hours and stay 3:15, that's a legitimate overage.
If it's a free car park and it is there for the benefit of cinemagoers, yes I'd say a 15 minute overstay when it's a particularly long film is spurious.
Spurious: Not being what it purports to be; false or fake: "spurious claims".
There is nothing false about their claim that you overstayed the three hours. As I said above, 80 pounds is certainly an excessive charge for 15 minutes of parking, but it is in no way a spurious claim. If you had parked there for 2.5 hours and the company claimed you were there for 3.25, then that would be a spurious claim.
To relate it to the main topic, $7500 is too much of a fine for the offense, but if the person did download the movie illegally, then the fee/fine/penalty is unjust, not spurious.
> Also, can private companies issue a ticket in the UK, or are you saying they just request that you pay more with a piece of paper?
Private companies cannot issue a fine.
If they have suffered a loss for which you are responsible, they can ask you to reimburse them for the loss - but in this example, the car park is free. So what's the loss?
The loss is revenue to the owner and/or operator. If the parking is "free" to you, then the cinema is likely subsidizing your parking, and that allows you to park for three hours for free (or perhaps the parking company just allows the first three hours for free hoping people will park longer so they can collect additional revenue). If you exceed this limit, then the cost of your parking is no longer covered, and someone should pay, whether or not you think it's fair. If you don't like those terms, park somewhere else or don't go. There is a cinema that I attend regularly with this exact policy: three hours free to me because the cinema pays the parking company for the first three hours. I exceed this limit sometimes (getting there early, 2.5+ hour movie, etc...) and I pay the overage of a few dollars when I leave. That's fair to me and should be to anyone who appreciates capitalism.
The third-party company invents a spurious reason to ticket you. (eg. "You stayed over three hours in this car park!" when parking at to the cinema to see a film that is 3 hours 15 minutes long).
I don't think you know what "spurious" means. If you pay for three hours and stay 3:15, that's a legitimate overage. The amount "ticketed" may be excessive, but if you only are supposed to get three hours, pay more or leave before your time is up. Also, can private companies issue a ticket in the UK, or are you saying they just request that you pay more with a piece of paper?
A committee is a group that keeps the minutes and loses hours. -- Milton Berle