Comment Re:How could you do it? (Score 1) 276
Mod this up, because he beat me to it.
Mod this up, because he beat me to it.
Perhaps they are aiming for a new demographic, who might feel embarrassed by every one else having low user ID's, and who aren't smart enough to understand yyyy-mm-dd date formats?
That's the only thing that makes sense to me. The beta is horrible and as a *LONG* time reader and commenter here, I won't continue visiting if they go live with that horrid beta interface.
The difference is that when you "lose" gold it still exists. If your hard drive crashes and you don't have your bitcoin wallet backed up your bitcoins cease to exist.
Actually no, they still exist, you just can't access them without the private key.
In theory, given enough computational power [unlikely] one could manage to find/re-generate the same private key and would thus have access to those bitcoins.
Of course, if anyone ever had that much computation power available to them it would probably make the rest of bitcoin unviable.
So from a practical standpoint the bitcoin are lost, but they still technically exist.
Pedantic I know. Perhaps one could compare it more to that gold being 'lost' by being converted into some other compound [ie. auric chloride]. The gold is unusable as a currency in that form and thus is 'lost' from that standpoint. But, given the technical know how and resources, you could presumably recover the gold from the compound but it would be difficult and expensive.
The biggest issue I had with I, Robot was that Asimov intentionally wrote robot stories that did "not" involve scary robots running amok and killing people, but that's exactly the movie they made.
On its own as an action/adventure sci-fi, and not branded as an Asimov story I thing the movie would have been much better received, at least by fans of his stories.
FTS: The Debian technical committee has been asked to vote on which init system to use, which could swing in favor of using Upstart due to the Canonical bias present on the committee."
So what are the chances of getting the Canonical-associated board members to recuse themselves from the vote, given the obvious conflict of interest there?
I think they were in SUCH a rush to get ANYTHING out the door, they literally had no clue what was in the bill.
"We'll read it after we pass it", was really meant by (Bless Her Heart) Pelosi.
Now, stop shitting in a M$ bash with politics...
You see small businesses make this mistake all the time: "If we only double down, and do what is NOT working HARDER..."
Then, they go under. If M$ does not shed the Ballmer curse soon, Apple will BUY them.
My son is taking Algebra II class in college that is using this method. So far, so good. He says that being able to watch the lecture, then go into class to ask the instructor questions relating to the lecture and the homework is like having a tutor.
I don't know how well it would work for more "not centric" classes, though.
I think your parent means thirty minutes since sitting down fifteen minutes before showtime. And I will add that every one of the half-dozen cinemas I have frequented since forever (in both Atlanta and Raleigh) has routinely showed a full 15 minutes of previews after the supposed start time. So having to wait 30 minutes after sit-down sounds about right to me.
And they are that loud. Count yourself lucky, wherever you are.
Doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith. - Paul Tillich, German theologian and historian