Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

Submission + - Dell (Michael) finally takes Dell (Inc.) Private (cellular-news.com)

williamyf writes: "The web is buzzing with the news. As expected Dell (Inc.) is finally going private. Today Dell (Michael) unveiled the proposal. $13,65 in cash per share. Mr. Dell is putting his shares towards the new entity, and part of his wealth as well. Finally, as expected, there is the $2*109 from Microsoft.
Here is from Cellular news:
http://www.cellular-news.com/story/58453.php

For added spice and a acerbic taste, check out "The Register":
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/05/dell_silver_lake_buy_dell/"

Comment Re:So which are the Indian Networking companies? (Score 1) 160

So who are the Indian equivalents of Cisco, Avaya, Juniper, Brocade, et al? Yeah, they do have domestic Telecom companies like Airtel, Reliance Communications, but others?

Of the back of my head, I can recall Tejas Semiconductor. There are others, google should serve you well.

Comment Call me out of retirement (Score 1) 492

The summary says:

It's too early for panic, but those of us in the early parts of their careers will be the ones who have to deal with the problem.

I dealt with the Y2K issue in a Telco environment. When the problem is looming closer, take me out of retirement and offer to pay me a small fortune, and I may consider showing you young lings how it's done. ;-)

Comment What abot the many eyeballs? (Score 4, Interesting) 129

After RTFA (I know, broke the rules), it appears it wasn't a documented or tracked bug. It was noticed and fixed more than a decade after it was created. Pretty much non-news. If no one ever noticed or cared that their cookies were getting lost on a kde restart then how can you expect it to get fixed? If no one calls it a bug, is it actually a bug?

"With enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow" Right?
Well, the theory of the many eyes say that someone somewhere should have noticed/reported/tracked this bug sooner rather than later.
this comes to prove that many eyes are NOT enough. First you need more than merely many eyes, you need many QUALIFIED eyes.
Second, you need to complement your (many) eyes with systematic test cases to so some QA, trying ad a modicum of rigor, instead of, you know, letting the QA become an ad-hoc subjective process...

Comment Convert Windows server 2003 to a Workstation (Score 1) 313

You do not say anything about the nature of your applications, if those applications are DOS style (windows vista and onwards are very picky about DOS apps), your best bet is either DosBox, or FreeDos on a VM. Dosbox emulates the whole hardware enchilada, so it may be a tad slower than runing Freedos on a VM, and both solutions run on modern 64 Bit Windows... On the other hand, if your apps are Win16 or Win32, read on:

Even if the windows OS is 32 Bit, having more memory through PAE can have good effects, as each app running will have a full 3.5GB or so address space all for itself. 32 bit versions of Linux had PAE support for years. 32 bit versions of Windows do too, but artificially limits that support in consumer versions, in part as a differentiation tactic, and in part because some drivers do not behave nicely with PAE enabled.

No matter if your processor is 32 or 64 bits, what determines the "32 bitness" of the system is the OS (that is to say, a 32 bit version of the OS will behave as a 32 bit version, even if installed on 64bit HW).

As many posters said, your most cost effective route is to go with XP compatibility mode in a modern (think Windows 7) consumer version of the OS (be that a 32 or 64 bit version of the OS). The problem with XP comaptibility mode is that support for the virtualized copy ends in 2014, so the solution is very short term, and that it runs virtualized, so anything hardware intensive will be slow as molasses.

Is any of those limitations is unacceptable to you, you may run a 32 bit edition of Windows server 2003 (R2) (which is supported until 2023 (2025), give or take), activate PAE to gain access to additional memory, and then fiddle with the settings to make it behave more or less like a workstation if needed be.

If you follow the workstation route, this link may help:
http://www.msfn.org/win2k3/index.htm

word to the wise: troll the forums for hardware whose drivers play nice with PAE.

Comment A geocentric model already exists (Score 1) 381

The math works, but that doesn't mean I have actual, physical negative frequencies.

2nd: Give me a few (hundred?) years and I'll come up with a mathematical model where the sun, planets and the rest of the universe is circling around the earth.

It wouldn't make sense whatsoever, but mathematically it still would be true.

...No need to waste many years of your life coming up with a mathematical model. The greeks did it "a few" centuries ago (in the 2d century AD, to be a tad more precise).

More info here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentrism

Comment CRCing & diff-ing do not a consistent deduping (Score 2) 440

After you have found the "equal files", you need to decide which one to erase and which ones to keep. For example, let's say that a gif file is part of a web site and is also present in a few other places because you backed it up to removable media which latter got consolidated. If you chose to erase the copy that is part of the website structure, the website will stop working.

Lucky for you, most filesystem implemenations nowadays include the capacity to create symbolic links (in windows, that would be NTFS Symbolic links since vista, and junction points since Win2K, in *nix is the soft hand hard symlinks we know and love, and in mac, the engineers added hard links to whole directories), both hard and soft. So, the solution must not only identify which files are the same, but also, keep one copy, while preserving accesability, this is what makes apple (r)(c)(tm) work so well. You will need a script that, upon identifying equal files, erases all but one, and creates symlinks for ll the erased ones to the surviving one.

Comment Re:Hackintosh your Macintosh. (Score 1) 417

Nope, you can not do that.

The devs clearly state (in red letters, nonetheless):
>

http://chameleon.osx86.hu/articles/chameleon-20-rc4-is-out

Having said that, is bollocks that an EFI 32 can not boot a 64 Bit OS. Hell, machines with BIOS, which are mostly written in 16bit ASM code can boot windows and/or linux in 64 bit mode, if the proc allows!

While I am not affected by the cut (Mac Book alumnim unibody late 2008), I can see why many people with powerfull machines are upset. My special sympathies to the Mac Pro users that were left behind, even though their machines can run in 64Bit mode, and they can buy OpenGL 3.0 Video Cards DIRECTLY FROM APPLE.

Comment Re:I will not believe it until... (Score 1) 178

Those are expensive only by consumer standards. It's cheap compared to regular academic journals.

While that might be true, my regular academic journals are various IEEE magazines (I am an electronics engineer, with minor in CS), and those are of comparable cost to HBR. I mention HBR just as an example of why I will not believe it until I see it, and I know HBR, because I also got an MBA latter on my life, so there was a LOT of HBR reading in 20052007...

Comment Re:Best practices say: Run antivirus! (Score 1) 285

If I worked for Norton, I would not be telling people I run ClamXav on my Mac. And I run Windows Security Essentials on my Windows 7 Machines (my folks, actually).

Do not worry about my facebook habits, yes I go there, but httpsEveryWhere, Noscript and AdBlockPlus are my friends too.

Point number 3 hints to trollish behaviour, but, FWIW, I've given you the benefit of the doubt, therefore, this reply.

Comment Re:I have some, and I don't care (Score 1) 285

As for new threats...the last round of Mac malware got right by every antivirus vendor out there, too. By the time the part-time intern that Symantec has working on their Mac version came back from Spring Break and added a definition, Apple itself had finally released a removal tool.

True, and yet, apple released a removal tool, all antiviruses now detect the threat because all the interns are back from spring break, and yet, the botnet keeps going strong and even growing a bit...

What that tells you is that people do not run antivirus, nor do they apply patches...

We teach with example, you know?

Slashdot Top Deals

On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.

Working...