Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Yes! Well, maybe. Okay, no. (Score 1) 216

I like the technological aspect of networked sensors and remote management, I intend to put sensors in my own home, but I can't get over how annoying this article is.

An article full of hand-waving is topped with this:
"And this is what Urban OS is providing, this kind of solution to analyse mass data, enter it in a context and perform magical actions."

The cutesy use of computing terms is grating:
"To support the myriad of different devices in a city the firm has developed an extensive set of application services that will run Urban OS, dubbed PlaceApps - the urban environment equivalent of apps on a smartphone."

"The OS completely bypasses humans to manage communication between sensors and devices such as traffic lights, air conditioning or water pumps that influence the quality of city life."
What previous problem is solved by having the city "OS" manage my air conditioning? Do I use too much? Should I put sensors in my house so UrbanOS can tell if nobody's home, then shut it off for me?

Frankly I'm not comfortable with the degree of centralization implied in this article. The folks who run infrastructure already have or are installing ever more networked sensors to ease maintenance, administration, and lower maintenance costs.

I get the feeling the article writer and McLaren Electronic Systems have very different things in mind.

Comment Re:Dear Slashdot, (Score 1) 758

I don't care that it's Microsoft. I would feel exactly same way if the writer said the same about anything else. I have never developed using the .NET platform, so I'm not about to defend a position I don't hold regarding .NET superiority or inferiority.

> A man states his opinion and is immediately vilified.
Yes, there is the danger that when one speaks his opinion someone else will express theirs in kind.

Comment In short: (Score 1) 320

There are those who are geeks-on-the-outside, and geeks-on-the-inside.
May this thread contain many posts about what ways we outgeek our fellows and grumble about the dilution of obscure skills and subjects by bringing them to larger audiences.

I'll start: grumble, kids these days and their Arduinos. I'd better use a DSP or FPGA in my next project. And kids these days think FFVII is the pinnacle of classic gaming. Grumble, grumble. *gets fed a mutton chop by Link*

Comment Plasma, one way or another. (Score 1) 106

I'd use 1 to 3 high powered electrodeless fluorescent lighting tubes at the center of an empty ball, and have the skin of the sphere be made from some sort of light-diffusing glass or plastic. Electrodeless fluorescent lighting is very efficient and long-lasting.

Actually, come to think of it, since it used one day a year, so what if the light source has 100,000 hours of useful runtime? Damn this fixation on longevity and efficiency!

I would make each vertex of the geodesic sphere a tungsten electrode (cooled if necessary) and have fairly high powered plasma arcs flowing across the ball's surface, switching directions, forming patterns, and suchlike. The viewers should avoid staring too long.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...