People always voice their concern when they're against something but rarely express their opinion if they're for it. This makes it unfair comparison. Just saying..
I don't think that's true. The article says that on assisted death, there were many replies on both sides.
There's a difference between this, and assisted death. With this bill there really isn't much of a reason to be outwardly in support of it. However, there are definite reasons to not support it. In the case of assisted death, there are strong reasons to take both sides. As such, people are more likely to voice an opinion.
Samsung copied Apple flagrantly, not *just* copied, but *flagrantly* copied. The jury saw that, and decided that that was wrong. The result was that Apple won its case.
We're supposed to reward effort, and not reward those who cheat. Despite the clamour from the android community, pretty much everyone I've spoken to who aren't emotionally invested in the result are "pro" the jury and think it was a fair result. Samsung- (and by extension Android-) fans, deal, and move on in life. Or hate. Your call.
Simon.
Ok, so when it comes to UI design.. it's ok for everyone else to copy from everyone else.. Apple can copy from Xerox, Microsoft can copy from Apple.. KDE, Gnome, ETC can copy from both. Yet, Samsung cannot copy from Apple?
Why did the Roman Empire collapse? What is the Latin for office automation?