Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Low Q? (Score 1) 366

Sorry, there is (naturally) nothing in the article or the court ruling about adding an extra fine for low quality. Would have been nice, though. =:)

Except for this: "In the case of Beck film calculated the damages including the cost of licensing the movie, on the division struck against the sale and to the shared film quality deteriorated film's reputation."

Comment Re:Activism (Score 1) 225

Its odd how online activism is treated much differently than that which occurs in meatspace. Many protests occur in real life where access to buildings or simply roads are blocked yet the treatment of the two types protestors is very different.

So you're suggesting that online activists should be tear-gassed, clubbed, and maybe a few of them shot? That doesn't seem very practical.

Comment Re:Holy Crap!!! (Score 1) 187

Actually, you can make the correlation/causation argument, and the authors did so: "Further research is needed to determine what exactly about the museum-going experience determines the strength of the outcomes. How important is the structure of the tour? The size of the group? The type of art presented? "
But in this case the correlation is important on its own. Something about these visits was beneficial to the children, and having visited this museum I suspect that both the art and the way it's presented are factors.

Slashdot Top Deals

The following statement is not true. The previous statement is true.

Working...