Comment Re:I feel for ya... (Score 2, Insightful) 260
You get what you pay for.
You get what you pay for.
But the Star Wars props aren't original designs. The early ones were Graflex flash guns with very minor modifications. They evolved slightly over the years, but the design didn't originate with Lucas.
Basically George is mad that someone ripped off a design that he ripped off already.
Actually it's not. According to the story, they make no mention of any Star Wars property. Third parties have gotten on the bandwagon and made comparisons, but not the manufacturer.
Besides, the props in the movies were just modified Graflex flash guns. I don't know if Lucas licensed those are not, but his designs are far or original.
Sure, they misspelled the word "low". They stared it with an "n" instead of an "l" and forgot the final "w".
What you are getting in the mailbox is most likely a TMC (Total Market Coverage) product. These products exist only to serve as a vehicle to deliver the advertisements. They may be part of the local paper, but they are not the main product, they only exist to generate revenue by giving the advertisers deeper penetration into the market.
The real local newspapers are the ones that cover the activates of the local government, police and schools. They are the ones that play watchdog on local officials, and while they are by no means perfect, they serve a very valuable purpose that won't be easily replaced by your average bloggers. The signal to noise ratio in the blogosphere is just abysmal. Even a poorly run a newspaper provides better information than every local blogger I've read. There may be exceptional bloggers out there, but they only cover a fraction of what needs to be covered.
We don't necessarily need newspapers, but we do need journalism. The problem is that newspapers provide more journalists in more local areas than any other medium. The local TV and radio stations in my area only report on 2 things - What the hear on the police scanner and what they read in our local paper. The same is true with the "news" bloggers. We may think that online news exists independent of newspapers, but that's just not true yet.
I honestly don't care if the companies that own the newspapers die, but if the papers themselves are allowed to die then democracy will certainly suffer for it. A conversion to non-profit might serve us well while we wait for the next big thing to emerge that will successfully replace newspapers.
I believe a re-trial would violate double jeopardy. Someone should look at the cases one and a time and look for abuses. There are bound to be a few cases where the kids were actually guilty of something worth punishing them for. The hard part will be determining what is fair.
So does anyone know if the judges are immune to civil actions? What would it take to strip them of that if they are?
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.