Didn't mean to add that moderation...

Yes they would.

If you believe this provides ANY level of security, you're fooling yourself.

Trial and error... It was a limited set of multiple choice answers. I'd just keep exiting and restarting the game if I got a question wrong until I could answer all of the presented questions correctly.

Is that kind of like gym being spelled with a j?

If I'm reading your question correctly, you're doing it wrong.

I've found most nics under windows refuse to accept vlan tagging without virtualizing them in some way. But that doesn't require installing any of the hyper-v components. You can do it with standard teaming. And this can be done with a single nic.

new-netlbfoteam -name whatever -teammembers ethernetalias -whateverotheroptions
set-netlbfoteamnic -name whatever -vlanid 123

So... has everyone just given up on unicode and now blames apple for using it rather than slashdot for not supporting it?

What part of the rest of the summary did I not read?

What part of drone did you miss?

I'll just leave this here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Each to their own. When I finally broke down and got a macbook my impression was "Well this is what I've been trying to get linux to be for years!"

Same way in Firefox. F12 for developer mode. Probably the same for IE.

Seems odd skimming the patent to apply this to offline video caching. It seems fairly specific to a method of automating the process of ordering, duplicating and shipping CD media. There is some ambiguous text in there about "digital media". But it also has claims such as:

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said first module is configured to send at least one signal to at least one printing device to create mailing address labels for each of said requests.

Which, I'm sure netflix is not doing. Seems like an attempt to broadly use a patent that's not really related to the actual process being used.

Shocking...

I don't think anyone would argue that it costs nothing to do this. Nor would they argue that it's easy. The argument would simply be whether or not it's cost effective. Can it be done for less than the costs of launching a fully developed habitat from the ground.

That's the job of the company providing the work. If they can make it work, more power to them. If they can't, failed business model. If they can't and it gets funded through tax dollars as a huge boondoggle, then it becomes a problem for the masses.

Prove that it can't be done cost effectively. Not random "Oh sure!! That'll work great!!! No costs at all!"

Apparently you have missed the fact that the old slogan has been missing from this site for quite some time...