Comment Re:How does this help? (Score -1, Troll) 103
Bans will - obviously - have a disproportionate effect on the law abiding over the criminals, so it will reduce the legal use of guns for self defense more than the criminal use.
Ah yes, the old "if-guns-are-outlawed-only-outlaws-will-have-guns" argument. This argument might be valid if gun-control advocates were trying to *ban* civilian use of guns, and most of them are not. Instead, they are trying to be more selective about who gets to have guns. That means things like stricter background checks, which, of course, will disproportionately affect criminals (and psychotic individuals).
The more logical slogan would be "If we try to prevent outlaws from having guns, then fewer outlaws will have guns". It's not as clever or catchy, but it's more accurate.
Also, with regard to what guns are most often used for... citation please. (I'm the second poster to call you out on this). Last I checked, the #1 cause for gun-related fatalities in the US was suicide. Followed (very closely) by murder. All other causes (law enforcement, accidents, self-defense, undetermined) trail far behind.
citation please. There are many countries which banned handguns and yet hand guns are used by criminals. Citation: Canada. Criminals don't care about the law because in most cases the law does nothing to prevent crime. It just tries to punish those that commit it. If they are even caught. If ever you have to deal with a criminal event you will understand how much protection criminals have since they don't care. In the end the most likely outcome is that they will walk free.