While this is a US centric video, I recommend it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

The WeeWii maybe?

Not quite! The Ring works in the way that showing it to someone else, ie/ passing it on, means that you won't be killed, unless you re-infect yourself. In this bug, even if you pass it on, you remain infected and vulnerable to permadeath unless you mod it out of your own account. Perhaps it's a bit like an extremely contagious STD, and that by engaging in an orgy with someone with this STD all participants catch it and and are able to pass it on and can only lose it if they medicate themselves (mod their saves).

That's amazing, thanks for sharing!

In schools, it's generally touch rugby that's played, where you count as tackled if contact is made with you. No heavy tackles allowed, etc.

The future is here guys!

And don't read physics, where they are simplified as a spherical woman in a vacuum

The pound is a unit of mass and separately a unit of force.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Pound_(force)
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Pound_(mass)
So it is the slug and the newton, in your scenario. The space dinosaur has 0 lbs of weight, but a mass of x lbs.

Do you work for Paizo or something? They took the 3.5 rules and reprinted and sold them with very minor adjustments. The rules have to be open as far as I am aware because WotC unusually made the Open Game Licence where they open sourced their base rules, and so derivative works need to follow suit, which is why PF books say OGL on them. That people even buy Pathfinder is amazing to me. I am in a Pathfinder game on Thursdays and the difference from 3.5 is barely noticeable. In another group I'm playing the d100 Space Marine game this afternoon for the first time, though this group switches between 4e, nWoD and stuff like Dark Heresy, but they don't see the point in Pathinder, as they have all the 3.5 books, so why rebuy them with another company?

Are WotC occasionally a nasty company? Yes, they need to please their Hasbro overlords or they will be cut in to oblivion. Paizo SHOULD put more work in to their adventures, as they already put minimal work in to the ruleset and made a bunch of cash from it.

But seriously, do you work for them, with a post like this?

The sheriff was the defendant. The plaintiffs intended to uses the likes as evidence that the defendant fired them for protected speech. The judge said that the likes were not protected speech, which infers that if he did fire them for that then it was legitimate, meaning the case did not need to continue.

I am not a lawyer, but that's what I took from TFA.

I'm betting he is doing what an informed consumer should and putting his money where his mouth is when making an informed purchasing choice, in chosing not to support and fund a business model he doesn't like.

Allow Mozilla.org with noscript and it should work, it did for me!

In the style of the worst newspapers, the Daily Mail start with the result they want and steer all discourse towards it, even if it means twisting and lying along the path. They will just make it up if they need to do so, and there have been a lot of cases where this has happened!

It's interesting you say this, the last two letters that I sent from the UK to my friend in the USA arrived opened. I do not know if it was the UK or US governments, but it is something I should really look at.

Other way round.