Comment Re:No cuts are ever possible (Score 1) 198
because every area facing cuts is always "critical".
Like this one?
http://blogs.reuters.com/great...
Over three-quarters of a TRILLION dollars on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter that,
In 2008, two analysts at the RAND Corporation, a California think-tank that works closely with the military, programmed a computer simulation to test out the F-35s fighting ability in a hypothetical air war with China. The results were startling.
“The F-35 is double-inferior,” John Stillion and Harold Scott Perdue concluded in their written summary of the war game, later leaked to the press. The new plane “can’t turn, can’t climb, can’t run,” they warned.
$59.2B for development, $261B for procurement, $590B for operations & sustainment in 2012
For something that no one in the military actually wants.
The real irony is it was supposed to be the cheap one to put up in numbers to support the F-22. The same way the F-16 is the cheap numerous one to support the F-15. Ended up costing probably more money than all the recent fighters combined.