Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Pusher beam, not reversible tractor beam (Score 1) 71

Lets learn to speak the language, shall we?

Tractor's pull. A tractor beam would pull. This pushes. It can't pull. This means its not a reversible tractor beam, which would mean it can pull and be reversed to push ... it can only push.

Its a pusher beam, and it only works in a fluid, on objects with tiny amounts of mass that can stand to be roasted into oblivion in order to move them less than distance of a reasonable sized dictionary.

Did you read more than the headline?


Actually, never mind. Stupid question.

Comment Re:Ho-lee-crap (Score 4, Insightful) 275

Not really. A cargo ship of that size is as complex as an aircraft carrier.

Considering this ship is designed to hold however many thousand cargo containers and the crew to support it, it needs a lot of empty space inside. Considering an aircraft carrier is essentially a city at sea, complete with nuclear reactors, aircraft hangars, repair shops, weapons bays, accommodation for a few thousand and mess facilities for the aforementioned plus its own empty space storage areas. I'm willing to bet the aircraft carrier is still more complex in terms of design and construction.

Comment Re: I don't follow (Score 1) 370

No no, this could turn out to be an HaterGate. Please do not try to bring facts into it! Let people who don't even use OS X come in and rant about the poor choices Apple consistently makes.

If they didn't consistently make such poor choices more people might be less against them. Basically unless you want to use your mac in the way they deem acceptable then fuck you. Fonts aside I find the mac deliberately obtuse and designed very much with form over function.

Comment Re:Confucius say: (Score 1) 355

Considering that my Black MacBook (2006) lasted eight years, it was a good investment.

My XPS from 2006 is still with me, but the equivalent Macbook would have been far more expensive. What is your point?

Today that price difference is not nearly as much. Looking at (as best I could find, not exactly) comparable systems, a Dell 15" XPS laptop is $0.99 MORE than a MacBook Pro 15". The Dell has a touch-screen but the MacBook Pro has an SSD and other differences. Perhaps if you took more time than I just did to build as close a system as possible the Dell would be cheaper, but I didn't find that.

You can bet dell but an extra chunk of cost on just because apple showed them people will pay that much and apple overcharge because they know most people who buy one want the badge more than any actual feature of the machine.

Comment Re:Confucius say: (Score 1) 355

Do the math.

But you already did it!

Anyways, Apple products can be pricey, but if you want excellent quality and usability, nothing on the market offers the same value.

Quality, fair enough. Usability is entirely subjective. For me using the mac at work is an exercise in frustration. Does look nice though.

Comment Re:(Re:The Children!) Why? I'm not a pedophile! (Score 1) 284

It's like you don't understand what "effects" are.

The long, long history of American jurisprudence has determined that your effects are materials held at home. Your smartphone travelling in your pocket as you go out in public, just like your wallet, is not an effect. Things on your person can be searched based upon probable cause without the need for a warrant.

So if they bust through your door when you're sleeping looking another (probably innocent) guy 2 streets away, is your phone safe then?

Slashdot Top Deals

"Can you program?" "Well, I'm literate, if that's what you mean!"

Working...