Bullshit.
When smaller entities try the same practices in Australia, the Australian Tax Office comes down hard and says the offshore entity is not genuine, but a method of evading tax.
However they do nothing when large conglomerates setup "offices" in tax havens.
Yeah, and that is exactly how they get around disingenuous offshore entities... by putting an office out there with at least 1 employee in it. Then it's legitimate. All the larger companies save far more than it costs to set this up when they do so. Smaller companies cannot offset the cost. But that's purely based on the amount of money your company makes. There's a point where you have to get some tax loopholes, as that's what most of your best competitors are doing, and you aren't going to want to compete with a handicap... But the solution is tax reform, and ianap (i am not a politician(thank goodness)) so getting waaay of topic here
Triggered...triggered? Dont use that bullshit social justice lingo. You weren't triggered you dont have PTSD. At best you were annoyed
Ran out of mod points, or I'd give you some
Always call people on this kind of shit. So many people trying to avoid responsibility for what they say or do these days.... and he was already posting as AC to begin with.....
He's making sites from scratch without programming because HTML isn't programming
this is just not true
any time you use code to write computer instructions it is "programming"
he uses CMSMS, which means he only codes part of the site "by hand"
internet coding is not complex compared to coding a first-person-shooter, but the demands of the individual coder are different
i've seen many coders spend 10 minutes writing some executable code then spend an hour figuring out how to get it to go where they want in the HTML page on a website to look right
HTML is structure and layout, not programming.
CSS is structured storing of display values, not programming.
Using a structured specified format to lay out static structural content is not quite the same as "computer instructions" Unless you call using notepad to write a shopping list "programming" (you're using the code of the alphabet to instruct the program to display them in a specific static order.....)
If you need your site to do more than display pages of content, you need something more.
A programming language of some sort.
There's javascript, python, php, asp, etc, etc, etc... All web programming languages.
Show me the pseudocode version of something written in pure html and css, and we'll see how much programming is involved.
Show me how HTML manages mutable variables, and basic logic structures and loops....
Before a government implements policy to go after stone drivers to prevent accidental death, it needs to be shown that stoners cause accidents!
considering that it is already illegal to drive stoned (DUI/DWI), I would say the onus is on the stoner community to prove that it is safe to drive stoned. Nice try to shift responsibility.
By your logic, that'd be like me saying: you are doing X. X is dangerous, so we make it illegal.
Now it is up to you to prove it isn't dangerous, until then, you can't do it. Where X can be anything from smoking pot to eating cornflakes to singing Justin Beiber lyrics in a public place.
The missing piece in the above example, and yours, is that perhaps the issue should be scientifically analysed and proven to be a problem before a law is made prohibiting it. I don't think the law should come first and it be up to the victims to do the research.
Responsibility is the lawmakers. And whoever votes them into office does so based on what they claim they're going to do - well the general public voters think that's what's going on anyway, but still, it's not on the general public to prove that THC intoxication doesn't significantly impact driving accident rates any more that we should have to prove any other arbitrary scenario.
This isn't shifting responsibility, it's leaving it where it belongs.
Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules. Corollary: Following the rules will not get the job done.