Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Missing Option: I HATE fireworks. (Score 1) 340

Yes, because anyone who cannot afford to pay for a baby sitter should forego ever eating out or watching a movie.

Or, you know, forgo such luxury items until some point after they've paid for their child's basic care needs, yea.

Basically, what you're saying here is that you don't think you should have to make any sacrifices because you chose to have and raise a child, and everyone around you should just shut up and deal with it.

See, this is the problem with babies raising babies.

Comment Re:4th of July? (Score 1) 340

"Pick one" is multiple choice, dumbass. You have multiple choices. It doesn't mean you can select multiple answers.

Except that "Pick one" implies that you only get to select one answer.

Dumbass, was it? Yea, you are.

Comment Re:4th of July? (Score 1) 340

That's cool for y'all.

We 'Muricans prefer to watch shit blow up (or blow shit up) in shorts and t-shirts whilst slamming ise-cold pilsners and either roasting animal flesh over open fires or in big vats of superheated oil.

Variety is the spice of life, after all.

Comment Re:No health tracking? (Score 1, Informative) 129

Why would anyone want to strap a watch to their wrist if it's not picking up heart rate, body temp, movement, etc...

Because some people think digging in their pocket to find a phone just to tell them the time is stupid.

That's my reasoning, anyway. Can't speak for anyone else, nor would I care to.

Comment Just Another Way to "Get a Hit" (Score 1) 415

Are they going to distinguish this new type of K-9 unit in any way, or is he going to be rolled in with the drug dogs? Because this seems, to me, like another way to drum up "probable cause" by sicking the dog on your car and "getting a hit," which then gives the SS an excuse to shred your vehicle and rifle through your belongings.

Because who, in this day and age, doesn't carry some sort of electronic memory device with them almost everywhere they go?

Kiddie diddlers my ass, they're making a new excuse to search you.

Comment Example (Score 3, Interesting) 75

Just came across an example of one of my complaints:

During the German lesson, I was asked to translate "Ein Mann trinkt Wasser." I accidentally wrote "The man" as opposed to "A man" or "One man."

Now, since I already have a basic knowledge of the language, I knew why I was wrong immediately; but would a person who's not already familiar really learn anything from the following "tip?"

You used the definite "The" here, instead of the indefinite "One".

Huh? That's just confusing, especially considering that we're talking about the very first lesson in the German group; someone who is not familiar with words having different modes (i.e., most uni-lingual Americans) would find that extremely difficult to understand.

 

Comment Re:Wife (Score 4, Informative) 75

Playing with it now (phrasing, BOOM)...

First impressions: it's cutesy fun, and the site is obviously based on the same system that Codeacademy uses.

Two problems I've noticed thus far: 1, certain parts want you to use a microphone. I HATE websites that want to use my mic, and I'm pretty sure I'm far from alone in feeling that way.

The other, larger issue I have is that, when you answer incorrectly, the system doesn't necessarily specify why you were wrong, which tends to lead to frustration and ultimately, giving up, since not knowing why you were wrong makes it a lot harder to know how to be right.

Still, leaning towards the "this is pretty cool" end of the spectrum, and hopefully it gets better with time.

Comment Re:Though crime is here! (Score 1) 185

I don't think he actually bought the tools. He was googling around for some of them, and for a recipe for chloroform, but I just read the New Yorker article and it didn't say he bought any of the tools. He talked about having an oven he could fit a woman in, but didn't actually own such an oven. He also talked about having a cabin in the woods they could take a victim, but he didn't own such a cabin.

If he had bought the tools, yeah I'd say a conspiracy to commit murder charge might be appropriate, but he didn't. So it was still in the realm of fantasy.

What, you mean a mainstream media outlet gave me bad info? Inconceivable!

Regardless, the whole thing is creepy as fuck. Ordinarily, I wouldn't give a crap what somebody's fantasy or fetish is. Their business. Even this guy's. But once he started naming names and making plans, that pushes it over the edge. That is a hard, hard thing to say "live and let live" about.

Agreed; add in the fact that non-government-agent types who have done pretty much the same thing were not let off so lightly.

Comment Re:Though crime is here! (Score 2) 185

I don't even know how they could arrest the guy. He had done nothing at that point, he had made no plans to do anything, no tools, according to his ex who installed spyware on his computer, he was supposedly writing on anonymous fetish sites.

I presume you're basing this assumption on the contents of TFS.

I read some other articles about this case yesterday - he bought the tools, and used a classified police database to shop for victims. To me, that's a bit past "fantasy" and more into "planning to do this shit."

Slashdot Top Deals

Friction is a drag.

Working...