Well of course he should.

He should also understand what the word "risk" means, and how to mitigate it.

For example, people SHOULD be able to ride a bicycle on the shoulder of a busy interstate, but that would be mind-blowingly idiotic because of the risks involved.
One SHOULD be able to take a walk through the 'Brews neighborhood wearing an Adolf Hitler costume, but again, that would be insanely idiotic.

Same goes for strolling through any low-income, crime-ridden neighborhood flashing a shit-ton of expensive stuff that's easy to steal. Like jewelry.

I see this is your first time reading a BH blog post masquerading as a news item.

Yea, they all pretty much end up the same way - with the audience wondering what the hell he just wasted 10 minutes of his life reading.

Boudoir photography is as old as the camera itself, and every American household has owned once since about the 1960's or 1970's. Cellphones have jack to do with it.

Pretty much. Probably just as effective, too.

Well, you can do a lot if you would stop frequenting orgies and stripping to the buff in the middle of the public library...

Seriously, are there a lot of places where one would typically get naked around groups of other people? I can only think of 2 places where I strip down to my birthday suit, and both of them are in my own house.

I only came here for the "what a massive douche this guy is" comments....

Yes, that's called "negligence."

It's why, in that situation, the bank would refuse to reverse the charges, and probably get away with it.

I never so much as implied they were. You inferred what you wanted, because you don't want to accept the truth of my statement: Every society that has forcibly disarmed the populace turned into abusive, totalitarian states.

Although, I wouldn't use the surveillance state of the UK, nor the police state of Israel, nor the heavily-armed-populace nation of Swizerland in your example. Really, the only one on that list I consider historically clean (we all know what Japan and Germany's past sins are) would be Canada. But then, you can legally own guns in Canada, too.

Rather than the current situation of a mid-scale war with damn near every single other middle-eastern nation, arming rebels who then turn out to be ISIS.

Considering how things have turned out, I almost would have preferred the "war with Iran" option. But the fact is, our blood and treasure will be used to protect US corporate interests in the region, regardless of which puppet gets "elected" to lead the charge.

Point of fact, ISIS started in Syria, a nation we never sent troops to who would need "pulled out." So that theory falls on it's face.

No, bud, we got ISIS from US officials who insisted on arming Syrian rebels without regard to the potential fallout - US officials like Barack Obama.

Hey, isn't that pretty much how Al Queda got their start, too? And the Taliban?

Nope, still going strong thanks to members like myself.

Thing is, just like moderate politicians, the ASPCA doesn't try to find the loudest megaphone possible to scream through, so media-wise they tend to get drowned out by the lunatics.

FYI, "nobody needs X" is as piss poor and invalid an argument as "for the children." Nobody needs a lot of the stuff you use every day either, but equally nobody else has the right to tell you "you can't have that stuff because you don't need it."

You don't have to be a member of a terrorist group to feel that eating babies is wrong. Side note, I find it funny that when people talk about "eating baby animals," PETA people included, most people don't mention chicken eggs. MMmmm, delicious poultry fetus...

If they're super-smart, they'll avoid interaction with the criminally insane primates who rule this planet all-together.

Put both groups in a sealed room with a puppy, a gay baby, and enough cudgels to go around.

The problem will solve itself.

Sure, but under the line where it asks why you're nominating the person, just put "for not being George W. Bush."

He'll be sure to win.

Funny, just before I read this comment I was thinking, "someone should send a letter to Greenpeace about PETA's lack of regard for the environment."

Nothing like sicking 2 terrorist organizations on each other and watching the fun unfold.

According to the reward committee, Obama's achievement was not being Bush.

Although in retrospect, they probably should have waited a bit to make that determination.