Don't listen to this idiot. Collection companies have zero duty to assure the legitimacy of the debts they own.

I second this, and add - demand a fully itemized bill before you pay a dime. That's how I found out the bastards were trying to charge me full retail price for every implement present in the OR during my operation.

Yea this.

When I read that line I said to my wife, "ERROR implies that it occasionally benefits the patient. This shit is on purpose."

Putting the cart before the horse, aren't we?

Unless they can navigate ever present, always changing construction zones, those things will be useless in my state.

That's called "team driving," which my aunt and uncle did for decades. The similarity of terms between that and "Teamsters" is probably cause for the confusion.

Computers also lock up, crash, burn out, get hacked, fuck up due to poor coding, etc.

Not that humans are any better - just pointing out that "have a computer do it" isn't the panacea you seem to think it is.

And this is why pedantry is at least occasionally useful and important.

As with any business contract, party B would be free to buy party A out of their half of the contract. Presumably, this would absolve party A of owing any sort of child support later down the road.

Don't overcomplicate things. That's a good part of why our legal system is so corrupt.

By that reasoning, you must think Mitt Romney is God.

Diane Feinstein believes that every American who isn't a cop or politician is a violent criminal who hasn't been caught yet, and thus believes that only cops and politicians such as herself should own firearms... I don't see any conservatives standing up to defend her...

I think what you really meant to say there was "why do conservatives always defend the rights of people I decide not to like?" The answer to which being, they don't, but that's the perception you choose to have based on your particular, subjective view of reality.

So where does ruining a persons life because you saw a video of them doing something legal that you don't like (say, for example, holding an unpopular opinion) fit into your concept of a 'free' society?

FYI, trying to reason your position with an individual who has already decided that they are "right" is as effective as screaming at a brick wall.

Our only hope is that someday these SJWs will become victim to their own practices, and hopefully realize the error of their selfish ways.

So when people are being recorded they should pretend to think some other way?

That's retarded. Maybe instead more folks should put their big girl panties on and realize that other people being opinionated assholes is NOT worth starting a federal case over.

Physically assaulting someone is a crime, deserving of punishment.

Verbalizing your distaste for another person and/or their attitude is not.

This new mentality of "everything I disagree with should be illegal" isn't just part of the problem, its the whole goddamned thing.