Does this mean "priv" is exempt from this patent?
How much money can you spare for getting justice?
Oh c'mon... they never heard of photoshop? Either they don't have the document, or they figure it's not worth their time to make the watermark illegible.
Robust watermarks are difficult to get rid of. small example based on decade old research
The real question here should be where's the original document and why is the Administration hiding behind 'National security' to avoid releasing it. I've had enough of that over the previous 8 years. Change!
Surely such a question can be asked. But only when democrat dogs stop chasing republican tails, and the republican dogs stop chasing democrat tails. Oh yes, bitter I am.
So where is this "leaked document" that the summary alludes to?
To quote from Geist's blog:
selected groups granted access under strict non-disclosure agreements and other countries (including Canada) given physical, watermarked copies designed to guard against leaks.
I hope that answers your question. Unless you want to out the person leaking this document, he can't ever publish a photocopy of it as it will be traced back to him. And if you think such deception is beyond our autocrats, read up on this and this
Don't panic.