Maybe they could do something crazy like making a general puopse launch center that can handle SLS, Space-X, others, now and into the future instead of starting from scratch on each new program.

You must not have a kid buying lunch in school.

You can't claim it's non-existent because the system is set up in a manner that makes it extremely difficult to detect, especially in states that don't require an ID.

It's like you saying you don't have cancer because you can't see through your skin and see it.

And if asking someone to drive to the DMV and get a photo ID is too much of an imposition and tantamount to "Racist", what would this be?

Fine, go ahead, make it mandatory, have Automatic Registration, with biometric ID used at the polls. If you are going to go all Orwell, do it right.

SCO is like some old guy in the mountains with his mule panning for gold. He just knows he'll strike it rich one day.

The fact that over 700 amendments were still unable to fix it should tell you something. In the end, no Republicans voted for it.

Democrats will often say, well, what's your alternative? When you are standing at the edge of a cliff and one party is contemplating jumping, you should not be discussing different ways of jumping. Perhaps just not jumping would have been the better solution.

Around 60 AD?

Most transparent..Ahhahaha..Most..hehheahhaaa..Most transparent Admi...cough choke...ROFLMAO! oh, Fuck It, I can't even say it without laughing.

For not being a Science Agency, they sure do employ a lot of Scientists to justify their regulations.

No one seems to remember that multiple tickets result in suspended licenses. Driving on suspended licenses results in your car being impounded. Continue and you end up in jail.

The thought process behind this would also justify higher prices for food, medical care and other services based in your income.

Stella!!??? is that you?

Funny, I looked for that phrase, "political speech", in the text of the 1st...didn't find it.

You're just sucking up to the American people.

But that's the point. It's the linguistic equivalent of relative morality. If there not a single morality, then there is no morality. If there are no fixed and unchanging rules, then there may as well be no rules. A common frame of reference is required.

How would a physics work if the rules of physics changed at the whim of the physicist? How could programmers work if they were able to change the syntax on a whim? When they do, they call it a new language.

If you don't follow the rules, then you can't order chicken or fish