Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This has more to do with Apple lock-in (Score 1) 323

This is one more step in pushing their own schemes.

Sure, on the face of it there's benefit from being able to avoid being tracked by 3rd parties.

But what do you want to be you'll be unable to change your device's iBeacon ID in the same manner?

What's an iBeacon ID? The iBeacon is the device that is installed in the store. iBeacons send data. iPhones receive that data. Never is anything sent from an iPhone to an iBeacon. And while the app on the phone is able to process the data from the beacon, that is completely opt-in. As in you need to use the app in the first place.

(Sorry for disturbing your completely irrational Apple hate. You may now continue.)

Comment Re:You missed the biggest downside (Score 1) 521

What if I don't want to save my changes?
"You can use the 'undo' command they say..."
Yes but the undo command isn't persistent between applications, much less a power failure.

On OS X auto save is combined with versioning. So, yes, you can undo changes. Even after reboots.

Comment Re:Or we could just be the first? (Score 1) 608

Could just be that we are the first (somewhat) intelligent life around.

Of course it could be. It just seems very unlikely.

I've read a bit about the topic before and everything you said has already been considered; there should have been conditions favorable to life billions of years ago.

We could be the first. The question is still: why?

Comment Re:Its likely impossible (Score 1) 608

I'm starting to become convinced there is simply no way to travel in a meaningful way among the stars. No species has figured out how to do anything like FTL or even slow boating.

That doesn't matter. Even if you don't have FTL you could still build Von Neumann probes which would be able to colonize the galaxy - even with fractions of the speed of light.

http://www.nickbostrom.com/ext...

"If a probe were capable of travelling at onetenth of the speed of light, every planet in the galaxy could thus be colonized within a couple of million years [...]. If travel speed were limited to 1% of light speed, colonization might take twenty million years instead. The exact numbers do not matter much because they are at any rate very short compared to the astronomical time scales involved in the evolution of intelligent life from scratch (billions of years)."

Comment Re:How great is your filter? (Score 1) 608

it stands to reason that the "filter" could in fact be very close at hand, either through some social thing like nuclear war, or something else like a nearby exploding supernova.

It can't be something like a supernova. That would be random and some civilization wouldn't have encountered any and would be ruling the galaxy right now.

No, the Great Filter must have something to do with biological or technical progress itself. Either it's very unlikely that intelligent life evolves at all or it is very unlikely that a civilization reaches the level where they would be able to colonize the galaxy.

So if we find life elsewhere, that would make it less likely that the Great Filter is located in the earlier stages.

Comment Re:Because text size need not be defined by px num (Score 1) 333

OSX is unfortunately bitmap based

What is that supposed to mean? A lot of artwork comes in bitmap format. But there are also quite a few PDFs and the OS doesn't really care either way.
The graphics system is point based. Where a standard display features one pixel per point and a high dpi display has two (by two) pixels per point.
Apple tried to make the UI scale arbitrarily, (the feature was available for development purposes for years) but it didn't really work all that great, because there are too many cases where you get off-by-one errors that look quite bad. They eventually decided that it wasn't worth the effort and instead opted simply for displays with a 'high enough' resolution (i.e 'retina' displays) and integer scale factors.

Comment Re:TFA clueless, thinks Coke brand is worthless (Score 1) 185

It's trademark, intellectual property, that allows you to tell the difference between Coke, Pepsi, and RC cola.

No, it is not.
It is my nose and taste buds that tell me the difference.
Lipstick(trademark) on a pig doesn' change the fact your still dealing with a pig.

Yes it is. Because you can't taste every bottle of Cola before you buy it.

Comment Re:just FUD IMHO (Score 2) 303

A thought experiment: Replace 'Apple' with 'Chinese phone manufacturer' and 'NSA spying scandal' with 'Chinese spy scandal'. Would you still trust them?

Actually, that would worry me less, since I can't think of anything the Chinese would want to do with that information. The US on the other hand has already proven, that they think they are the world police.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...