Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: (Score 1) 119

The problem with this in relation to the article is the price:

ICANN has proposed an application cost of US$185,000, not including yearly upkeep fees.

Now I don't know about you, but most "people" don't have that kind of money to throw at a domain name. The real thing to think about: How will this affect online shopping? Those big companies with money to blow will get their fancy gTLDs whereas small businesses and freshly started ones who don't have that kind of money will be stuck with what may eventually become the 'less appealing' .com/.org/etc that we already have. Will these small companies be pushed aside because they lack the appeal of having a fancy gTLD? Will people be more suspicious of them because it is easier for malicious people to set up a spoofed site with a .com than a .insert-big-corp-here?

Comment Re:Not yet (Score 1) 265

No, previous methods are too slow because they examine the contents of each file, whereas the new system is completely passive and only looks at the hash.

A handful of network-monitoring tools can identify specific BitTorrent files, but the process is generally slow, since the contents of each file have to be examined. The time that this takes also increases exponentially as the number of files that need to be scanned grows. "Our system differs in that it is completely passive, meaning that it does not change any information entering or leaving a network,"

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...