uhn : )

At first scan,

I immediately changed to classic view because the new view involves too much scrolling to scan the stories and I want to see the text, so headlines only is no good.

I feel there is not enough contrast between each story's background and the page background. It doesn't take a lot, a bit more contrast would do.

How do I manage what comments I see ?

The page width in the comments is not wide enough.

The right column is too wide (but story and comment width seem ok if I reduce the width of my browser : the right column appears to go to the bottom of the page).

Best,
MArc

Good points.

"Too bad both of you were not in Boston today."

Does that make your comment worse than theirs --considering what happened in Boston today.

" One of the least corrupt countries in the world is Finland, where your traffic fine is proportional to your income."

+10

the infamous "helicopter video" they'd have published the whole thing instead of editing it down to make it look worse like Assange did. And before the fanboys downmod me YES that's what happened, he admitted to it, and later published the entire video. Which you can still view on Wikileaks but the site "collateralmurder" still links to the edited version.

The edited video does not seem dishonest, it does not change the message in a significant manner, and as you said they did publish the full raw footage. And the website you mention has both videos up and a third version with commentary by US soldiers.

Do you have any other footage, or links ?

Yes, to keep things going as they did, the implied software flow, in a situation like they had, gives me chills.

Chills just like the ones I get when an emergency vehicle, with sirens blaring, cuts an efficient pathway through traffic.

hmmm
  : )

Yeah, it is too bad they used the same strain of rats used by GMO manufacturers.

Still, independent studies done for longer periods of time on particular GMOs are clearly needed before a particular GMO can be deemed as safe as they are being portrayed by GMO manufacturers' salesmen and their researchers.

"Well, yes, since non-serious peanut allergies do not represent a threat, of course it is serious peanut allergies."

: )

Well no, it's on a continuum : Very Serious --- Serious --- Moderately-Serious --- Lightly Serious --- Non-serious

So it's serious peanut allergies now ? No matter.

I too think labeling foods that contain ingredients derived from DNA recombination is a good idea and easy to do.

http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2012/01/plant-micrornas-in-your-blood.html?showComment=1325884165958#c8757155746212485557

From the link : "Granted, RNA may be less stable, but I'm not at all surprised we find it in the blood after a meal."

"But it's as safe as any other food."

Old ones [food stuff involving DNA recombinations] and each new one need to be tested with more stringent standards, for longer terms, and by more independent researchers in more independent labs.

"You do know that many foods that humans have eaten for centuries have been discovered to pose a threat in recent years?"

It should be labelled. Please mod parent up.

"A hundred years ago it was said miracles of science would feed the world with an unbelievable array of giant, hearty and delicious foods"

Because it was said does not make it any closer today. Rhetorical florishes aside.