Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hell hath no fury .. (Score 1) 356

And let's say that the odds of them catching you in round 1 are 65%, then 84%, then 70%. Is the cumulative effect of this higher than 84%? Yes. Each layer adds a little bit, but each layer also has diminishing returns. This is how government looks at security with regards to, say airport scanners, or terrorist watch lists, or polygraph testing. They know that the individual methods by themselves are shit. They're just hoping that with enough layers, enough randomized checks, and everything else, that the final result will be a high detection rate.

Wanna walk me through the math please? I don't think that your statement regarding the probabilities is accurate.

Comment Re:Only if they have a phrenology test (Score 1) 282

Not to forget, lie detector test have zero impact on psychopaths, so basically the worst of the worst will pass, kind of making the lie detector scam pointless, or more accurately the question reaction flim flam show pointless. This being the reason they are banned in most countries. This really stinks of the FBI intending to use fake like detector tests to incriminate any one they want too and these plans are threatened by the exposure.

And also remember that the most infamous and successful spies in the United States passed their polygraphs handily. Polygraphs are a dangerous distraction when relied upon as they have been in the past and apparently continuing into the future.

Comment Re:Why isn't this tagged with the censorship logo? (Score 1) 403

Actually, Yahoo might be breaking the law by hosting the site. Free speech law goes pretty far in the US, but encouraging suicide, or any other major illegal activity could get them in trouble.

He specifically linked to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention website for those whom it may help. That to me is evidence that he was not advocating suicide nor encouraging anyone to do so.

Comment Re:Pathetic (Score 4, Insightful) 223

We could do with doctors having some end of live training. I have watched too many elderly relatives treated with expensive and painful procedures that only managed to lengthen their suffering a very short amount of time. Often increasing their suffering for that time. Yeah, lets try chemo on an 85 year old who is more cancer than man! What the hell is wrong with these doctors?

Doctors!? What about 85 Year Old Cancer Man's fearful obsession with trying to eke out even a possible tiny few months more of life? What about 85 Year Old Cancer Man's family who sues the doctor years after Cancer Man dies because the doc "didn't do all he could and spend tens of thousands of dollars to eke out another few months of pitiful life for our father/son/husband!!!!11lleleventy"

Talking directly to Cancer Man I say this: dignity, motherfucker, do you speak it? Try dying with it then you selfish asshole. The ultimate issue is that in the US, there is no dialog on death and dying, there's only more fear. We don't talk about dying, we don't want to deal with dying, we don't want to see people dying, we don't want to deal with what we sometimes must do after death (like plan funerals, etc.) Death and dying as a natural part of living are treated as almost a kind of taboo subject and rarely intrudes into public consciousness except for when complete fucking morons spout off about "death panels" and pile on more and more fear.

As a people, Americans are now defined by and controlled by every kind of fear imaginable and more the kind of fear that is only imagined.

So tell Cancer Man and his family to sit down, have a nice hot cup of shut the fuck up and figure out how to make his dying as best as circumstances allow instead of driving up everyone else's medical costs, suing good doctors into oblivion and/or driving good people out of medical practice in the first place due to these hysterical lawsuit-happy SELFISH ignorant fools.

Comment Re:Fine with me (Score 1) 274

by Tough Love (215404)

It's fine with me because all those smug assholes who were too shortsighted to see this coming from twenty years ago should suffer for their stupidity. And in this day and age, whoever is stupid enough not to be moving forward with a Microsoft exit strategy deserves what is coming to them.

Apropos 'nym is apropos.

Comment Re:Copyright itself is problematic for technology (Score 1) 259

Funny, I've never had the understanding that kickstarter is mainly for established artists. I'll concede the point, however, because arguing over kickstarter would be missing the main thrust of what I was talking about and why I mentioned it in the first place; namely, there are other sources of revenue that can help encourage people sharing their art to the general community while still honoring their sense of artistry.

Comment Re:Copyright itself is problematic for technology (Score 1) 259

Okay, that's cool too. What I briefly outlined are just some more options that people have successfully made money using. Personally, I think it's enough to support a vibrant atmosphere of creativity.

Besides, just by using Kickstarter, doesn't mean the other models cannot also be used -- huge money in Hollywood making $100 million movies or the RIAA model of distribution/middle-manning it can still be used and art created with those distribution channels can still be purchased and enjoyed.

Slashdot Top Deals

God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner

Working...