Nope. None of those are toys.
There is an actual definition of toy.

A toy is an item of play that helps a young person develop skills, usually fine motor skills.

Most of these toys are not actually toys. Just an excuse to make shit up.

"kills oems ability to innovate and differentiate."
except all they are doing is innovating ways to confuse customers, and put on crappy bloated software.
They aren't really innovating.

They will differentiate they way the do now: Hardware and style.

It sounds like practicality and realization. I.e. You're not the important and no one gives a damn.
You can't use a cell phone and have complete anonymity no matter how man spy movie you watch.

Don't want to be tracked, then you should be online or using cell phones. or CC, or banks, or cars, or.. well anything.

"I'm actively disinterested in it."
A haters got to hate.

Android and the MS case aren't even comparable. It's like comparing oranges to trucks.

Apple can make demands on the phone companies, and Apple can make changes to the carriers don't move any device. This would hurt more then just Apple.

East or West, your going to end up in the same place eventually!

No, MS had touch tablets years ago.
It's took Apple to tell people they wouldn't be cool if they didn't have one.
And I'm glad they did it, I love tablet computers of all sorts.

rule, that article reliance on genetics isn't it.
And a lot of it no longer jives with modern genetic science.

Wow. it's like your from the 1970's.

So you not only don't understand market cap, you also didn't read what he was talking about?

Hint: Tesla is NOT worth 60% of GM.

Yes, Tesla is a fringe product. And it will be until there are less expensive models.

Tesla is a cutting edge car, and they are planning on less expensive models.
Initially, the automobile was a fancy tow for the rich.

And there are much bigger things with combustion cars that can go wrong that can go wrong with a Tesla. Your point?

"...volume doesn't mean dick."
of course is means something, don't be daft.

"one of the most heavily subsidized corporations in the HISTORY of CAPITALISM"
no it isn't, not even close.

Did you read what he said? of course not, to busy jumping to conclusions.
Of course, the bailout was due to the financial division, not branding, marketing, or cars.