Not the same thing. Not even close. Private dwellings on the internet are supposed to protected by some form of authentication.. Its a enormous library. If you want something kept secret don't be a luser and put it on the internet. I guarantee the root cause of this is some jackass who wanted to be able to access their data from home. He didn't go around url hacking, he used google. Its like they put it in the yellow pages and got pissed when someone saw it.

What governmental model does a corporation represent? I've always seen the corps at best as a communist state. At worst, a personality cult.

Thats weak.

Go buy offline explorer and set it to any large domain or wget for that matter. Make it ignore robots.txt and grab every link and soon you will have yourself at terabyte of fun. Its bullshit to think that if its publicly accessible that person can't make use of it. How many times have you laughed and said I simply must have that cute little kitty for my person collection? Thats you lolcat thief. This is retaliation for some small minded crat who got his panties in a wad. The only place this guy went wrong is perhaps he should have told the journalist that he could search google for his search term and find the goodies.

We know.

Couldn't someone sue them for negligence in allowing these documents to be publicly accessible? Really if it was that sensitive, shouldn't the button monkey that allowed them to be indexed by google be the most responsible?

A bag cost nine bucks at a the farm store. Its not a poison. Its a FDA approved additive for livestock feed. It is composed of fossilized diatoms. Works well on fire ants also. Doesn't really kill them all, it just encourages them to move on. It will get rid of many small insects.

Quagmire is left handed. Who knew?

As soon as I find a tilt a whirl, i'm gonna build me a spaceship!

I'm sure none of it will cease to exist in that time.

I installed cm10.1 on a Samsung captivate today. Took it from its stock froyo build straight to ics in just 30 minutes. The instructions are more complicated than a one button upgrade but really the problem isn't that there is no way back. The problem is that people don't demand the same service for their purchase from the manufacturer.

I can't get any information on the endpoint or their testing methodologies. It shows a 2% packet loss on every test but i've been running winmtr continuously to a ip in the dallas area and have received no packet loss and my tests on speakeasy test to dallas are at the qos i'm paying for. All in all I say this is just another half assed government money pit.

One possible solution that I didn't consider last time, would be for Google itself to notify the webmasters and credit card companies of the leaked information, and then display a warning alongside the search results.

That right is reserved for mpaa to censor my subtitles to my video files and other important stuff like that.

Ill tell you. Its the guys with more than 80% market share.

Sue the best.