Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment First step (Score 3, Insightful) 296

Before they can even think about making their web sites accessible for those with disabilities, they need to make the sites accessible for the general public. Nearly every time I have needed to find some information at the state level, I've had to sort through pages of outdated info, buried 4 or more links deep. I can only imagine what this process is like through a screen reader or other adaptive technology.

Submission + - New DMCA Exemptions Announced (copyright.gov)

BlakeReid writes: The Library of Congress has announced new exemptions from the DMCA's anti-circumvention measures, including:

DVDs for fair use by remixers, documentary filmmakers, and film professors
Unlocking and jailbreaking cell phones
Video games for security research
Software protected by obsolete dongles
eBooks for text-to-speech conversion

The exemptions are good until the next rulemaking, presumably in 2012 or 2013.

Comment Re:It's a shame, the out-of-the-box requirement. (Score 1) 177

Thank you for your detailed response. Insight like this is exactly why I posted to ask /. If I had any mod points left, I'd mod the parent up.

H.264 has additional license fees for professional use. Yes, most people ignore that.

Upon further investigation, I discovered http://www.mpegla.com/Lists/MPEG%20LA%20News%20List/Attachments/226/n-10-02-02.pdf Which states, in part:

"MPEG LA announced today that its AVC Patent Portfolio License will continue not to charge royalties for Internet Video that is free to end users (known as Internet Broadcast AVC Video) during the next License term from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. Products and services other than Internet Broadcast AVC Video continue to be royalty-bearing, and royalties to apply during the next term will be announced before the end of 2010."

Therefore, the statement in the grandparent comment is incorrect.

in fact, you won't have to pay anything as the hardware decoder is already paid for by the hardware manufacturer, and you don't owe anything for encoding the video, look it up

I will make my videos free to end users, so at this time I will not need to pay any fees. However, if I had planned on charging for access to the videos, I may have gotten into some trouble if I had not read your comment. Thank you.

Comment Distros and Documentation (Score 2, Insightful) 2

There are four modern distros that I can recommend for someone in your situation.

For servers: Although these distros can be used for workstations, they are super stable (running only mature versions of software) and make great server OSes:

CentOS - This distro is designed for use in enterprise situations. It's very useful if you plan on, or think you may work with Red Hat Enterprise Linux in the future.

http://centos.org/ http://www.centos.org/docs/5/

Debian - A stable distro that uses only free http://www.debian.org/intro/free software out of the box. There is also a "testing" version of Debian that you can use if you like the way Debian works, but want to use newer software. See http://www.debian.org/releases/

Which one should you use? That depends on which workstation distro you want to use, as I will explain below.


Workstation distros: These distros Are designed mainly for workstation use and are less stable (Less mature, but still very usable) than the distros above.

Fedora: Uses the cutting edge of open source software to provide a super modern workstation distro. It has the best hardware support of any Linux distro I have seen. Great environment for developing Linux software as well.

http://fedoraproject.org/ http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/index.html

Ubuntu: I have mixed feelings about Ubuntu. It is based on Debian. It is designed to make Linux easy to use for the average computer user. As such, it makes a great workstation distro. Every two releases they have what's called a long term support release. Which is supposed to be more stable than a standard Ubuntu release. However, the Ubuntu team seems to be more focused on usability and eye-candy than stability and hardware support. Even when using only LTS releases, I always seem to find a few nasty regressions or memory leaks and such. Because of this, I would only recommend it to those who are VERY accustomed to Windows or Mac OS and want as little change as possible. IMHO it is not suitable for medium to large size businesses.

http://www.ubuntu.com/ https://help.ubuntu.com/

Because Ubuntu is based on Debian, it uses the same package management system (apt & deb). So if you use ubuntu for your workstations, you should use Ubuntu server or Debian for your server OS.

The same rule applies for Fedora and CentOS. It uses a different package management system (yum&rpm).

There is also another distro that uses RPM & yum called OpenSUSE, but I don't have much experience with it. http://www.opensuse.org/en/

Some books to read if you go the Ubuntu/Debian route:

https://www.amazon.com/Official-Ubuntu-Book-Benjamin-Mako/dp/0137081308/ http://apress.com/book/view/1590598202

And for CentOS/Fedora: http://apress.com/book/view/1430219645

And a very good book on many Linux distros: http://apress.com/book/view/1430219122

Choosing a distro is a bit like choosing a car; you need to find the best one to fit for your needs. Try all of these distros for a wile, read the documentation, install them, use them as if they were running on your production systems. Then make a choice.
User Journal

Journal Journal: Please mod me down 1

I've been writing many stupid posts recently.

If you see such a post, please don't hesitate. Mod me down.

Modding me down will help to tame me and make me a better person.

Comment Drivers (Score 1) 2

...but I hope that I can learn to write drivers for hardware (never needed in Windows)...

You won't need to in a modern Linux distro either (unless you want to). Hardware support is generally very good. You'll find that 99% of the drivers you need are already in the kernel and work out of the box.

Submission + - Windows Administrator move to Linux 2

x_IamSpartacus_x writes: I have been administering Windows machines for more than 10 years and am extremely comfortable in a Windows environment. I went to school as came out with a Windows Network Administration degree, my CCNA and a Cisco Network Admin degree and have worked in the corporate world administering mid-level scale Windows environments. Unfortunately, I took only 1 (basic) Linux administration class and promptly forgot it because it had no bearing on my degree plan(s). I know the slashdot community will hate me for this but I would really consider myself quite technical and yet I know virtually nothing about administering Linux. I am hoping that the slashdot community can (after forgiving me for my obvious lack of geeky Linux knowledge) help me get started on my quest to be as familiar with Linux as I am with Windows. I have no CS background so I am not a programmer but I hope that I can learn to write drivers for hardware (never needed in Windows) and get a deeper understanding of the Linux environment and it's strengths. Where should I start and what path should I follow to do this?
Hardware

Submission + - Build a $200 Linux PC (extremetech.com)

WesternActor writes: Computers are getting cheaper to buy every year, but there are still sometimes advantages to building them yourself. ExtremeTech has a story about how they sought out the parts for a $200 computer that (of course) runs Linux as a way of breaking the budget barrier. They even test it against a commercially available eMachines nettop to see how it compares in terms of performance. This probably isn't something everyone will want to do, but it's an interesting example of something you can do on the cheap if you put your mind to it.

Slashdot Top Deals

egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0

Working...