The FBI is a federal law enforcement agency. Their mission is to force the will of politicians upon the people.
FTFY
If you're going to count the TV license, you'll need to include a portion of your cable bill in the U.S.
Except that I don't need to pay for cable (Netflix, digital antenna, etc). In the UK if you own a TV, you have to pay a yearly tax.
The $11,000 in 'lost' wages is quite questionable since it is compensated with vacation time
Do you honestly think that a few extra weeks of vacation time is worth losing 23% of your pay? A price differential, absolutely - I'd gladly take a small paycut for more vacation time. But nearly a quarter of your income lost? That's a horrible trade off for the increase in vacation days.
I'm not sure why you're comparing the NHS insurance to Social Security, when that's a separate program for them entirely - I just wasn't able to find numbers on what they pay as a tax rate for their equivalent of Social Security.
Alright. I couldn't find data on the taxes to fund UK retirement, so that's not included here and SS is left out to compensate. If you can find the numbers, I'll gladly update with that data. I currently make $52,000 per year. Health insurance premiums are $50 $63.75 per bi-weekly paycheck for health, vision, and dental combined.
US - Federal Income Tax: $6,078.75 State Income Tax: $1,330.94 Insurance Premiums: $1,657.50 Healthcare Expenses (this year, highest I've had due to surgery, ongoing sinus issues, and a higher deductible): $1,123.90 Fuel Tax (assumed 12 gallons per week * 52 weeks): $404.35 Medicare: $738.92. Ohio Sales Tax (assumed $200 per month taxable expenses): $156.00 Grand Total: $11,490.36.
UK - Income Tax: $4,830.00 NHS Tax: $3,292.45 Fuel Tax (assumed 12 gallons per week * 52 weeks): $3,112.61 VAT (assumed $200 per month taxable expenses): $480.00 TV License: $234.26 Grand Total: $11,949.32. However, due to the mandatory additional vacation, paternity leave, etc, UK companies do not pay as high of a salary initially - I have been approached by UK recruiters and it seems that there's about a 23% decrease in pay for my field (Applied Economics / Econometrics) simply for working in the UK. That means that instead of making $52,000 per year, I'd make roughly $40,250.00 per year ( £25,000.00). Adding in the lost salary of an extra $11,750.00 (pre tax, so some of that money would be added to the taxes paid and the rest would be lost income), and you have a final value of $23,699.32 paid in taxes if I were to move to the UK and obtain a similar job.
That's an extra $12,208.95 in taxes paid if I were to work in the UK instead of the US. That's roughly twice as much in taxes paid. You also have to remember that the UK tax rate increases are much steeper, so as I would work and earn raises, my taxes paid would increase far faster in the UK than in the US.
oh great, another place for TSA to go and stick it to you.
"There is an unexpected item in the bagging area. Please remove your pants and wait for a TSA agent to perform a cavity search."
Far more days off, no copays/deductibles/coinsurance plus premium healthcare...and even have paternity leave.
And a much lower income as a result. Also, the "no copay / deductible / insurance premium" is crap since they pay HUGE income taxes instead. There's a reason all of those nations rage about how Americans are "materialistic" - because the United States is the only developed world that doesn't tax the living shit out of their citizens to the point where they have very little disposable income. Also, for those benefits (mandatory longer vacations, mandatory paternity leave, etc), compare salaries for the same job across countries - you'll find that (with few, if any, exceptions) the US jobs pay more because you're being more productive and spending more time working. I've been approached by recruiters in other nations (such as the UK) and my pre-tax pay would be significantly lower if I accepted a their job - and that's before their absurd tax rates.
We should just start moving away from free trade arrangements. Go back to having tariffs likely through a VAT with subsidies for domestic job creation.
You just made every economist cry with that statement. Free trade benefits all countries involved and tariffs harm both the nation enacting the tariff as well as the nations they trade with.
In case of (3), if there's a message so important that it's worth interrupting a meeting for (why else would you check notifications?), just have your secretary check on it and warn you in person when such a message comes in.
First off, most people don't have "secretaries" to take their messages. Secondly, it allows you to discreetly tell if the incoming alert is just an email that you don't care about or your wife saying that she has to take one of the kids to the hospital. A quick glance at your wrist lets you know if you can just ignore it or if you need to leave. Also, how is glancing at a notification "interrupting" a meeting? Something tells me that you don't attend many meetings....
The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst