It isn't if you attach it to sharks. Then, instead, it's deadly.

Indeed, 640K ought to be enough for everyone!

3) Why are combinations of two words on the list, where one of the two is also on the list already? The combination would already be banned due to that single word.

4) Why is "dome" on the list? You can't even describe a building with a dome?

Only car-sounds are allowed! But you can choose between Ferrari, Lamborghini, F1 and Mining Truck.

We couldn't live in a universe with both matter and antimatter since they destroy each other. So it's obvious that a place where life appears and we get born to ask that question, has only one of them.

> And where would the unobservable universe be?

Beyond the horizon where it is too far away for its information to ever reach us in our lifetime due to the lightspeed limit.

What we see is just the observable universe. What if all this missing antimatter happens to be in a non-observable part? You'll never be able to see that! Unless those faster than light particles end the theory of observable universe of course.

The more CPU time you got, the more quality. Real-time animation is not going to look as good as non-realtime animation. However, the good news of the article summary is that CPU's, and the algorithm they devised, are now fast enough for having real-time rendering that DreamWorks finds good enough to call animation quality! Nice.

But it's only 400 of them! Even the Intel 4004 had more.

Very cool and all, but why does the summary call this a "Computer Chip?

Unless they chose the terrain to match the visible pattern.

The article says the rocket costs $10 billion.

The whole Large Hadron Collider cost $9 billion.

How can a single rocket, a tube filled with fuel, cost $10 billion? Please explain.

The quality of first posts on slashdot has dramatically decreased during the last year. What is causing this trend?

For crypto, you need *Perfect* random indeed, but for music, a pseudorandom generator should surely be enough?

Yay, thanks Trinity team!!