Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment The Pragmatic vs Tweaking war rages on (Score 3, Interesting) 503

I always end up going back to a customized XFCE, but about every 6 months, I decide to try something else, and usually end up wiping my system and reinstalling before I'm done.

My wife has a mildly customized XFCE setup, and she loves it. It almost never gets changed or tweaked.

Comment My Seagate Experience (Score 1) 237

Out of the four harddrive failures I have had in the last ten years (I often replace smaller drives with bigger ones before they fail), 3 of them were Seagate drives and one was a hitachi. I will never by Seagate again. Meanwhile my other Hitachi drives and Western Digital drives still spin on.

Comment Perhaps the easiest way to defeat such a system: (Score 1) 102

Though this tool might prevent DOM traversal and node name referencing, it most certainly will strive to keep the website layout the same, from the user's point of view. Therefore, a simple bypass is to look for inputs via relative page positioning. That should completely bypass the anti-bot automation functionality. This type of check would be easiest to perform at a lower-level, but it certainly can be done via bot injected Javascript.

Comment Er... (Score 1, Insightful) 1251

Communities make laws that represent the majority in their community. They also commonly erect statues that represent something about their community. We don't throw out laws when one person's views are represented. How is it that a conservative community can't display a symbol with historical significance which represents the majority view? It isn't being "forced" on anyone (unlike a law). If you don't like the statue, don't look at it. There might be a case if tax payer dollars were used, but they weren't. If at some point the majority in the community no longer feels represented by the statue, then they can elect council members who will tear it down.

Comment Re:Stupid premise, stupid code (Score 1) 226

See BlackPignouf's response for an example of why I think Ruby sucks. I never said it should be restrictive. There should simply be one right way to do something, not a hundred ways. Python, which is not perfect by any means, is pretty good about this. It is a very flexible language with lots of libraries, but there is a very limited way of doing any one thing. There is also plenty of guidance on the "Pythonic" way of doing any particular task.

Comment Stupid premise, stupid code (Score 4, Insightful) 226

A good programming language is not one that is full of fucking "whimsy". A good programming language has a clear, concise set of commands which are self documenting. It should be difficult to write the same, simple function in multiple ways. Ruby fails on all accounts. The wording is inconsistent, there are about 45million different ways to write any given function which also means it is hardly self documenting.

I've rarely met a Ruby developer who was employable in another field because they simply don't know what constitutes good, clean, concise code.

I've got karma to burn...

Slashdot Top Deals

Any given program will expand to fill available memory.

Working...