Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Games

Submission + - Classic games forever an allure for modern gamers? (yahoo.com)

David W. White writes: Ben Silverman has an article on yahoo games http://videogames.yahoo.com/events/plugged-in/legendary-asteroids-record-smashed/1396032 that states that at least three long standing class arcade video game records have been broken so far this year — Asteroids, Donkey Kong and Frogger, three of my favorites. Its amazing that people are still playing these games and for the duration it takes to set new records — it took 58 hours of continuous play to break the Asteroids record. What drives video games fans to be so obsessed with these classic games. Is is because they potentially fall in the NP-Hard category as discussed recently on Slashdot?

Comment Re:No. (Score 1) 322

If you build an AI which has emotions and is functionally indistinguishable from a human in terms of emotional response, I will be very impressed. You haven't done that, though, have you? Nor has anyone else. Call me when you do. (Better give your great-great-grandson my phone number.) This is what the turing test is hoping to determine, but so far no (AI creation) has been able to pass it though some have reportedly come close. When considering if passing the Turing test is proof that "computers can think and reason in exactly the same way people do", it interesting to note Searle's conclusion compared to Turing's in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test. And by the way, I'm a real human, not an AI.

Comment Re:Just to throw this out there (Score 1) 322

[The "no polynomial-time algorithm" bit is only true if P!=NP. And to the best of human knowledge, it happens to be the case that P!=NP.] Actually, we don't know for sure if P!=NP (though most experts in the field of computational complexity beleive this is the case), and no one has been able to prove or disprove that P==NP.
Bug

Submission + - Commercial bug free software ever? (blogspot.com)

David W. White writes: At the university where I work, I spend a lot of time researching bugs in complex software. Notwithstanding the separate works of Turing, Sipser and Aorora and Barack in showing that software assurance is undecidable, the debate still rages on as to whether companies can ever develop commercial bug free software. On the one hand there is Fishman's article here (http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/06/writestuff.html), as well as http://www.sigpwned.com/content/economics-perfect-software, and on the other hand there are the recent articles like http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/may/25/insideit.guardianweeklytechnologysection, and http://www.sigpwned.com/content/economics-perfect-software. Slashdoters even join the debate again last December as in here http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/12/23/157215/Is-Code-Auditing-of-Open-Source-Apps-Necessary. What are your views? Can we ever practically develop bug free commercial software? David White

Comment would Einstein work for darpa? (Score 1) 597

A Mr. Don Bright emailed me to ask if I really thought that Einstein would have worked for Darpa. My response is below:
Yes, I think Einstein would have worked for DARPA (if he was given the security clearance). Please note that Edward Teller (who was directly involved in the Manhattan Project) was also a friend of Einstein and was consulted by Einstein's team about the necessity and urgency to develop the nuclear bomb. Discover states "Despite helping to spur Roosevelt into action, Einstein never worked directly on the bomb project. J. Edgar Hoover, the director of the FBI even back then, wrote a letter to General Sherman Miles, who initially organized the efforts, that described Einstein's pacifist activities and suggested that he was a security risk. In the end, Einstein played only a small role in the Manhattan Project. He was asked by Vannevar Bush, one of the project's scientific overseers, to help on a specific problem involving the separation of isotopes that shared chemical traits. Einstein was happy to comply. Drawing on his old expertise in osmosis and diffusion, he worked for two days on a process of gaseous diffusion in which uranium was converted into a gas and forced through filters." Taken from http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/18-chain-reaction-from-einstein-to-the-atomic-bomb/article_view?b_start:int=0&-C=
Note that the article says "Einstein was happy to comply" to work for the Govt/Military on this aspect of the project, and it could be implied that it was just because he was not given the necessary security clearance why he did not become more directly involved in the larger Manhattan Project.
Regards.
David W. White

--- On Fri, 6/20/08, don bright wrote:
From: don bright
Subject: Re: your question on slashdot
To: David W. White
Date: Friday, June 20, 2008, 12:42 PM
yes but would Einstein work for darpa? You did not ask "where are all
the Edward Tellers"

Slashdot Top Deals

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...