Comment Re:Theocracies (Score 2) 862
Ok, I'll take a shot at it since you asked, but it's probably not going to make any difference to you.
The Bible declares that in the beginning he created the heavens and the Earth. It doesn't say how long that took. It also declares that Satan ruled the earth at some point in time, rose up in rebellion with his forces and was rebuffed (Isa 14). His kingdom was then destroyed by flood. The results are described in Jer. 4 and Gen. 1. Satan was already in that fallen state when he went after Adam and Eve and the only time that could have occurred is before they got there.
After that, God restored the world to a livable state in 6 literal days - seeds grew again - the skies cleared so the light could shine down - and he created lots of new birds and animals, along with man. Confirmation of multiple floods is seen in 2 Pet. 3 where the world is declared to have perished in a flood which could not have been Noah's local flood because the social system didn't perish then. Likewise the waters are said to have naturally abated after Noah's flood but fled at God's rebuke after the first one (Ps. 104:5-9). That the world was not created in a "void" state is confirmed in Isa 45:18. The word translated vain is the same as void in Gen 1 "without form and void" according to my reference notes. If nothing else, the command to Adam to go and "replenish" the Earth should be a clue that something was there before.
Other than acknowledging that Satan ruled the Earth and ruled a reasonably advanced people before the Garden of Eden, the Bible doesn't say anything about those times because the Bible isn't about that part of the Earth's history. The Bible doesn't say how long the Garden of Eden period lasted. It could have been a long time. At any rate if you study the scriptures there is no place where science and the Bible are in conflict. There are things recorded in the Bible that science says can't happen - the miracles and healing of individuals and such - but I've personally witnessed people I know healed of stuff the Doctors didn't have a way to fix, so I accept the rest as truth as well. You're free to dismiss my eye-witness testimony just as the accounts in the Bible are dismissed.
As far as evolution goes, I'm perfectly comfortable with natural selection and micro evolution in today's world. As far as macro evolution is concerned, since the Bible is mostly silent on the 4.54 or so billion years of the Earth's early history, I have no Biblical basis to argue with it either. It would be nice to see some evidence of it today on something other than a natural selection or micro level, but it isn't something worth arguing with a evolutionist over. Once you get past the micro level it gets tougher to convince me that beneficial changes sufficient to declare a whole new and different animal or fish or bird would propagate, but that's just my opinion - different colored bugs or critters becoming more predominant in a region is easy. But again, it isn't worth an argument about and this post is only meant to answer your comment. The Bible is about the history of God and Man. The Bible isn't a science book. But it doesn't conflict with science as we know it today either.