Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Price point (Score 1) 503

The biggest difference between ebook readers and mp3 players is that one can stuff existing CDs into their mp3 player and use content they already own.

If I could do that easily with all of my books, I'd pay a hell of a lot more than $30 or even $300 dollars for a reader.

Comment Re:blindsided? (Score 1) 411

"Everyone else either works in some local service industry or isn't in the work force. That would make the statement "NJ is a state of 2 suburbs" true."

That statement doesn't leave room for "less than 50%"

I'm basing my observations on actual observations. I've lived in the state for a while. I'd still like to know where you're getting your 4-5 million number from and why you think that they represent only highly-educated people. I know quite a few people that work in Manhattan, live in NJ, and who are not highly educated.

Comment Re:blindsided? (Score 1) 411

I hope you're not drawing your conclusions by how many people travel into Manhattan daily.

It sounds like you've either never been there or have never been outside of northern New Jersey if you have been there.

Many New Jersey residents who work for Rutgers, Princeton, Seton Hall, J&J, Pfizer, Merck, AT&T, Lucent, and Verizon would probably qualify as highly educated. Those are not "local service industries."

Comment Re:blindsided? (Score 1) 411

Did you read the heartland.org article? It doesn't say that "New Jersey has the worst business climate," it says that "New Jersey has the worst business TAX climate."

Big difference. This statement is based primarily on the breadth of the sales tax base.

NJ doesn't tax toilet paper, food, or clothing. This places more of a tax burden on people buying TVs and cars, and less on people buying things like cereal for their kids. If that means NJ has a bad business tax climate, so what?

Honestly, I'd rather pay 7% for my TV knowing that people who can't afford TVs didn't have to shell out more to feed their kids so that my TV could be cheaper.

Comment One interesting thing (Score 0, Offtopic) 88

One interesting trend I'm seeing here (as people flock to fight "their" revolution on the Iran story a couple of posts below), is that while the vocal minority that is the Internet connected America keeps worrying about other countries affairs, the government does what it is supposed to do: legislate on internal matters.

It is more positive for USA and the world when their government does its homework and clean up their house, much better than when they try to fix the world and accomplish neither the former nor the latter.

Comment Re:Travesty? (Score 1) 447

Yah, I know, but I meant explicit in 2009 terms, which means showing penetration for sex and blood spray for violence.

Really, there was a whole episode about Spock needing to get laid. And in it Spock and Kirk fight to the death. How is that not sex and violence, right?

Earth

Ancient Ecosystem Found In Ice Pocket 49

ApharmdB writes "Beneath a glacier in Antarctica, scientists have discovered a community of microbes growing in frigid pools of salty water. It's a particularly tough environment, with no light, no oxygen, and extremely cold temperatures. But the microbes appear to live — and thrive — off a combination of iron and sulfur, according to a new study. The result of that strange metabolism is a brilliant red streak of cascading ice called Blood Falls."
The Courts

Appeals Court Says RIAA Hearing Can't Be Streamed 208

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has overturned a lower court order permitting webcast of an oral argument in an RIAA case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, in Boston. As one commentator put it, the decision gives the RIAA permission to 'cower behind the same legal system they're using to pillory innocent people.' Ironically, the appeals court's own hearing had been webcast, via an mp3 file. The court admitted that this was not an appropriate case for a 'prerogative writ' of 'mandamus,' but claimed to have authority to issue a writ of 'advisory mandamus.' The opinion came as a bit of a surprise to me because the judges appeared, during the oral argument, to have a handle on the issues. The decision gave me no such impression. From where I sit, the decision was wrong in a number of respects, among them: (a) it contradicted the plain wording of the district court rule, (b) it ignored the First Amendment implications, and (c) there is no such thing as 'advisory' mandamus or 'advisory' anything — our federal courts are specifically precluded from giving advisory opinions."

Slashdot Top Deals

One small step for man, one giant stumble for mankind.

Working...