...route, and I hope the suffer the same inglorious fall from grace.

Just a few years ago I would have implicated Sony, but Samsung's recent moves tell us that it is they who will violate confidentially.

Is this really what Samsung wants to do? I've been steering everyone I know away from Sony products for more than a decade now, and what I suggest when they ask what brand they can trust I have always told them Samsung. I ask you, is there any major brand who are on the side of consumer/customer privacy out there anymore?

...think they should pay anything for stealing the rights away from property owners.

...be paid to landowners for easements? We've already been sold down the river when it comes to commercial aircraft and radio waves that pass over our property. Personally, I think the line should be drawn here. You want to fly a drone a few feet over my house, you pay.

So WPA2 wasn't necessary? Really looking forward you to enlightening me here.

Are you sure? I thought WPA2 was created to solve the problems with WPA.

I thought WPA was found to be insecure a long time ago! Are there really still entities that depend on it for security?

Surprised that a site for scientific minded people does not include that caveat.

...open hardware could prevent us from paying exorbiant prices for decent performance and allow us to get the full value out of the hardware we invest in. I had to allow scripts from "academia-assests.com" to view the text of the first link if anyone else runs into the same blank page I did when I clicked on it.

I don't know, and perhaps it isn't so.
But the more machines control our gates,
The less we humans can control our fates.
But into the future we go!

...that banks are 100% liable in cases such as this. It is up to them to verify that any access to the accounts that they hold are made by the legitimate account holders. Seriously, think of what the world would be like if any yahoo could write a check against any account without them veryifying the authenticity of the signature.

Somebody needs to put these paid taxi services to bed. Ride sharing in no way involves set fares.

Because criminals doesn't deserve a second chance...

No, rapists should not be given a chance to rape again.

How about self regulation? This isn't simple fleecing of riders we are talking about here, this is rape! So just what is Uber and the other ride "sharing" companies doing to ensure their drivers will not rape their riders anyway?