Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:like those are hard to see on teh intarwebs (Score 1) 110

Don't forget double-billing your account each month, which triggers your credit card company to auto-cancel the fraudulent, err, second charge, and using *that* to cancel you for non-payment, while continuing to charge you each month, and demanding either a year's service contract or $100 to recover your backup . . .

not that they pulled that on me . . .

hawk

Comment Re:meet the new Bus, same as the old bus (Score 1) 51

>But when I get on a bus, i know where its going.
>These buses may decide my destination is not
>worthwhile, and take me far from where I expected.

Actually, that's not it.

They've figured out that you're *wrong* about where you want to go, and will take you to the *right* place.

So welcome your new bus overlords . . .

hawk

Comment Over 25 years too late (Score 1) 174

This is more than 45 years overdue. Apple was in position to dominate this market two generations*before* you start.

The Mac IIfx had slave processors that were essentially a 6502 with a bunch of other stuff on the chip that could handle the AppleTalk network.

AppleTalk could be run over the second pair of the home phone wiring.

All they needed to do was sell the $10 chip to go into anything that someone would want to control in the home . . .

At the time, Apple would have gone broke selling a $100,000 Rolls Royce they built for $1k by insisting on building the garage to go with it . . .

hawk

Comment Re:"A Contract" (Score 1) 254

>Ads slow down our computers,

I suppose it's nearly 20 years ago now . . .

On a 486, which was still respectable though not top of the line at the tie, I had two full pages open (large monitor for the time), and both hit ad-heavy pages.

It brought the machine to its knees.

I installed junkbuster.

To this day, I don't block ads. But I'm downright aggressive with anything that blinks (or moves, or scrolls, or . . .), including "content"

hawk

Comment Re:Q: Why Are Scientists Still Using FORTRAN in 20 (Score 1) 634

And optimization has a lot to do with why Fortran is still used, and preferable to c/c++ in many cases.

Fortran can make some strong assumptions that it uses for optimizations. It is not as general purpose as c, for which those assumptions might or might not be correct. Yes, you can do nearly anything in either language, but some will be easier to do in one, and some in the other.

Expecting c to smash arrays into one another as well as a language designed for that purpose is silly--as would be expecting the time it takes to code in the more general purpose language to be comparable to the custom language.

hawk

Comment Re:Thank you Kemeny and Kurtz. (Score 1) 224

For some of us, "structured programming" was natural.

I'm of the generation that learned to code by cheating at star trek games.

However, from the beginning, my BASIC-80 looked more like Fortran 90. Having learned early about the search through memory of primitive microcomputer BASIC lead to through about where what routine should be, so setup was at line 50k+, main loop at line 1xxx, and so forth. Frequently a large program lacked any GOTO, or had just one to put you in the right section of memory. (Years later, though, on my dissertation, I realized that I was maintaining parallel blocks of code to avoid a GOTO, and I put one in. It's like the passive voice: "avoid", not "never use")

hawk

Slashdot Top Deals

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. - Andy Finkel, computer guy

Working...