No, you buy AdSense words, and it delivers matching URLs entered into Google -- then you grab the data there. Anyone can set up a data-collection like that.

There is no conceptual difference between entering a password and a secret URL. It is not security by obscurity, it is security by "something you know". Once someone else knows, it's not secure anymore.

The difference to passwords entered into other sites or Google is that it may not be immediately clear on what site to use the password, and with which user name.

Slashing subsidies for meat production would be a start.

Non sequitur. People are not dying fast enough. Life expectancy increases everywhere.

Non sequitur. Even if the population decreases, demand for meat is currently soaring, especially in the so-called emerging markets. This means drastically more land area and more water is needed than for growing traditional, primarily vegetarian diets.

More like, people with money will get the meat by paying for the land and water in other countries, while the people there starve. All this is already happening.

Also the concept of memes used here is highly dubious even in the context used here, and may not be useful at all.

It's a MITM attack. Heartbleed is not MITM.

OpenBSD 5.3 - 5.5 was affected: see their Security Advisories

Everything is vulnerable to Heartbleed.

No, what it means is that the majority of accounts are bots, created to increase follower-numbers.

Planetary_mnemonics

One person said something mean in a comment thread. Shocking! This is not the climate of the family-friendly internet I grew up with!

Seriously, a death threat is only relevant if it was specific and realistic threat.

If only they had written OpenSSL in Java instead of C! I'm wondering how many friends I can get on Slashdot with that statement.

..., I think that we need to do three things:

  1) Pay money for security audits of critical security infrastructure like OpenSSL
  2) Write lots of unit and integration tests for these libraries
  3) Start writing alternatives in safer languages

Given how difficult it is to write safe C, I don't see any other options. ...

(from http://blog.existentialize.com..., someone else linked this below).

Over a period of eight years, lawn darts had sent 6,100 people to the emergency room. 81% of those cases involved children 15 or younger, and half of those were 10 or younger. The majority of injuries were to the head, face, eyes or ears, and many had led to permanent injury or disability.

http://mentalfloss.com/article...

And one was killed.

Just use plastic ones!

"let" statements -- really?
And the selling feature is list comprehension? Looks like they are trying to go into Haskells direction.
Testimonials say it's better than C# for data analysis?
Well, that train has left the station, with R, Python (and Julia) being available. This can not be won by languages, but with high-quality statistics / visualisation / machine learning libraries.

License is Apache v2 by the way.

I O U

Not true. If 20% do something, it will be significant.
Everyone blame everyone else, and don't do anything? No thank you. Try at least.

Not true. Countries are affected differently, and some poor countries are highly concerned.

You are falsely blaming others. Even if not everyone contributes, change can be achieved, and it should be tried. Non-contributing countries could even be fined for not contributing to the common rescue attempt.

China has about the same emissions as the US. And guess why China has so much emissions? Because of the outsourced productions (electronics, clothing, toys). The US could easily implement requirements that their outsourced products have to adhere to emission limits!